Global change for investment portfolios

The relationship between ‘prime actives’ and ‘dependants’ is beginning to have wide implications on the demand for assets

In periods of low interest rates, high volatility and strong correlations across asset classes, it is vital to understand the factors driving global change. A portfolio that benefits from global trends is a prerequisite for the generation of stable and positive returns.

Understandably, there is some nostalgia for the ‘golden age’ of investing between 1982 and 2007, when the returns generated in the equity, fixed income and real estate markets far exceeded the rate of inflation.

However, this phase – which was shaped by globalisation, economic stability, the growing acceptance of capitalism and record corporate earnings – came to an abrupt end in 2008.

The very factors that had allowed this megatrend to develop proved unsustainable. One of the most striking aspects of the 25-year boom was the economic stability that accompanied it. Thanks to the disinflationary impact of globalisation, central banks were able to stimulate the economy at will without compromising their mandate to combat inflation.

When the dotcom bubble burst in 2000, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) immediately cut key interest rates to avoid a deeper recession – laying the groundwork for a bubble in the real estate and credit markets. These actions encouraged growing levels of debt which, in turn, smoothed the economic cycle by artificially boosting growth. As a result, the US recorded only 16 months of recession between 1982 and 2007. This is equivalent to around five percent of this period, compared to the occurrence of recessions during 35 percent of the period from 1854 to 1982.

Unfavourable demographic factors
The demand for assets is determined to a significant extent by the proportion of prime actives relative to the number of dependants within a country. In industrialised nations, the size of the economically active generation is constantly decreasing relative to the proportion of the population that is of retirement age: in Japan, it has been decreasing since 1990, and in Europe and the US since 2010. In China, the proportion of prime actives relative to the number of dependants is expected to start declining from 2015.

In most emerging markets, increasing numbers of young people are entering the labour market, but this alone is not enough to compensate for the unfavourable age structure in industrialised nations. As a result of this demographic trend, pension schemes that were established at a time when factors such as life expectancy and the cost of ageing were fundamentally different will come under mounting pressure. A few countries began adapting their pension systems after the 2008 crisis but further unpopular reforms are now unfortunately needed – posing a real challenge for democracies where the election  cycle does not coincide with the timeframe for such reforms.

Investments with zero interest rates
Industrialised nations have pushed their debt levels to the limits of what is sustainable – or have gone beyond them in some cases. Consequently, they are unable to further increase government spending in order to avert an economic downturn.

The US Fed, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank have all helped to mitigate the fallout from the 2008 crisis by reducing interest rates to zero.

When this measure also proved insufficient, they resorted to unconventional monetary policy measures such as quantitative easing or long-term bank refinancing operations.

This leaves them with little – if any – firepower in the event of external shocks like a surge in oil prices. Scenario analysis as well as portfolio construction should take the economic cycle and factors such as shorter durations and higher volatility into consideration. ‘Buy and hold’ strategies are unlikely to be successful in the future.

What is the value of savings if short-term interest rates are at zero for the foreseeable future? What is the attractiveness of long-term government bonds yielding below two percent with inflation running at or above two percent and central banks promoting policies which might eventually result in higher inflation? The current situation poses a major challenge for wealth preservation – not to mention the growth of wealth in real terms.

We are currently witnessing a shift in economic momentum towards Asia – a powerhouse that currently accounts for two-thirds of global economic growth. Population growth, coupled with a rising standard of living, is leading to higher consumption of commodities, while supply remains tight.

The identification of such trends is a prerequisite to achieve positive investment returns. However, this alone is not enough: one needs to carefully evaluate which economic agents are the true beneficiaries of rising commodity prices – it may not be mining companies but rather manufacturers of mining equipment, or countries that are altering tax regimes to capture a higher portion of commodity revenues.

Core investment beliefs
As an independent, globally active private bank, Vontobel is committed to thinking and acting independently. In doing so, we are always focused on one objective: helping our clients, whether private individuals or institutions, to realise their financial goals. To this end, we use our expertise to identify promising trends that will ultimately be reflected in client portfolios. We believe that the current investment environment poses challenges that require more than a ‘traditional’ asset mix and portfolio structure.

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.