Russia takes on the banking system

After the 2008 crash, Russia took measures to reduce the damage to its financial system. Its banks continue to fight back

After the 2008 crash, Russia took measures to reduce the damage to its financial system. Its banks continue to fight back

The crisis of 2008 and 2009 illustrates just how closely the Russian economy and its financial sector interact with the world’s global markets, with externalities remaining a strong factor in shaping the resilience of Russian banks. To understand future developments in the national banking system, it is necessary to understand three factors: the current state of the Russian banking environment in the wake of global events since 2008; areas where Russian financial institutions are susceptible to the European debt crisis and available mitigants; and long-term trends in the Russian banking system, which suggest that 2012 may not be like 2008.

The current situation
To bail out their banks in 2008 to 2009, countries worldwide had to go beyond monetary measures and resort to a wide range of budgetary levers, from direct nationalisation and troubled asset acquisitions to state guarantees and capital injections. The scale of asset purchases brought about inflated budgetary spending and mounting state debts, as toxic bank assets became state-owned. The burden proved unbearable for some countries as extensive state intervention in the economy, inflexible labour markets, and rampant red tape thwarted prospects for effective competition and growth. Attempts to put things right by slashing budget deficits and capping state debt produced lacklustre results, and even aggravated the plight, which brought Europe to the brink of a major sovereign debt crisis.
Russia was among the countries that took measures to shore up its national economy. According to the IMF, budget spending grew by more than seven percentage points of GDP, resulting in the country’s first budget deficit in a decade at 6.3 percent of GDP.

However, a swift recovery helped prevent the accumulation of debt, which peaked in 2010 at slightly above 11 percent before beginning to fall back gradually. The favourable external backdrop brought the budget balance above zero again as quickly as 2011. The economy has been on the rise since 2010, and is projected to grow at around four percent annually over the next few years.

The banking sector was hit by the 2008/09 crisis, but managed to resume growth as early as 2010, extending its vigorous recovery well into 2011, when the Central Bank of Russia reported a 23 percent year-on-year growth in banking assets. While the growth remained moderate for corporate lending which was up by 26 percent, retail loans quickly resumed pre-crisis growth rates at around 36 percent. Bank deposits continued to increase up to 24 percent, the share of bad loans fell to 4.1 percent, and banks posted record-breaking earnings.

In 2012, the year-to-date performance is clearly pointing at something of a slowdown in growth. Consumer lending is the only exception, enjoying rapid expansion even exceeding what was seen in 2011. Further slowdown is likely to creep in over the next few months, but healthy double-digit growth is on the cards for all banking segments for the full year.

Crisis influence channels
Today, it is still unclear how the situation with troubled eurozone economies will unfold, but it is obvious that the measures being taken by governments are insufficient, with the threat of a Greek exit from the euro still looming large. Given the circumstances, ‘hope for the best but prepare for the worst’ is probably the required strategy.

The crisis in Europe potentially affects the Russian economy mainly through oil prices and international capital flows. The two factors are closely intertwined as any declines in export revenues, which are bad for the GDP, contribute to Russia’s lower investment appeal and prompt investors to take capital out of the country. The combination of both factors adds to anxiety in the Forex market, putting pressure on the rouble exchange rate.

The impact of the crisis on the Russian banking system could extend to reduced availability of external funding and less market liquidity. However, given today’s situation, there is reason to believe that the scale of the impact will be relatively minimal. Firstly, Russian banks have learnt the lesson of the previous crisis well, cutting their exposure to risky foreign assets, in particular to peripheral eurozone debt. Secondly, they have used the past three years to evolve and create a funding system that relies chiefly on client deposits. Only limited external debt refinancing is required in 2012 and 2013, accounting for no more than four percent of GDP. The economic activity of European banks in Russia is already low, and those who view Russia as a core market are unlikely to leave.

Nevertheless, banks may face issues with the unstable rouble rate and mounting bad loans in case of a major economic downturn. Even though the past few years have taught large banks to expand their use of currency hedges, improve credit risk management and exercise more caution in screening potential borrowers, the Russian banking system remains vulnerable to external forces just as every other country does. While banks are working hard to cushion themselves from a possible crisis, the state is also on hand to step in and support the financial sector. Monetary policy is viewed as the cornerstone of future assistance to the economy and the banking sector.

The Bank of Russia is already an active liquidity provider as repo transactions hit an all-time high in June 2012, leaving space for further expansion since it is no longer forced to support the rouble rate. This greatly contrasts 2008 and 2009, when it had to raise base rates and sell foreign currencies, leading to tougher monetary measures and a shrinking monetary base. Regulators have a range of other instruments to choose from, including the expansion of the collateral-eligibility list, suspension of capital adequacy requirements, and syndicated loans.

The budgetary measures can go a long way to shoring up the performance of the banking system should problems arise. The government has already set aside approximately 350bn roubles as a crisis cushion, with the potential to further increase that amount should a crisis scenario materialise. However, it is important that the state understands spending constraints in fiscal opportunities.

The long-term trends
In the long-term, the Russian banking sector has huge growth opportunities, boasting low penetration of banking services and strong economic potential, including the benefits of WTO accession.

In 2011, total banking assets were worth 76.3 percent of GDP. Loan portfolios were at 42.6 percent, and client deposits at 47.3 percent. Russia clearly has plenty of room for expansion in its banking services market, most notably in consumer lending, which includes mortgage loans, as overdue debt currently stands at just four percent of GDP, and new corporate lending products are being rolled out regularly.

Russia’s largest banks have already embarked on a project to broaden their business model to encompass Russian regions, push digital and online services, and step up cross sales. Healthy input is expected from the industry’s consolidation trend, which has shrunk the number of banks from 1,100 to 900, while raising average capital per bank to 5.8bn roubles. This is expected to keep banks’ margins attractive.

The Russian economy’s dependence on oil revenues is expected to gradually decline, as physical oil exports have been fairly stable since 2004. The share of oil and gas exports in GDP fell below 15 percent, and is set to continue the trend in the future. As recently exemplified by China, joining the WTO might soon mean larger investments in industrial production and other sectors. Overall, the Russian economy is ripe for growth, seeing quality expansion driven not by reckless exports of natural resources but by a stronger legislative framework for all businesses, and the promotion of initiative and entrepreneurial spirit. The country can no longer afford the costs of ineffective management.

The crucial ingredient here is the end of turmoil in the global economy. What is desperately needed is a more consistent switch from pumping liquidity into the market, financing consumption, to boosting savings and industrial production. Any structural problems take a long time to tackle, but being locked in constant crisis management means driving the attention and resources away from growth.

Both the economy and banking system of Russia have become an integral part of the global market and, should the debt problems of eurozone countries persist, there will be another period of turbulence. However, Russian banks, the Central Bank, and governments are better positioned to address the possible crisis today more than ever before. There is a strong argument for a more optimistic outlook for the Russian economy and its banks in the long-term.

Comments: 1
Join the discussion below
  • A.S.Z.

    Thanks to the author for a good article, which reflects the real situation in the Russian economy and the Russian government’s attitude to the existing problems.

    A. Zakaryan

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.