The great land grab – business as usual

If World Bank loans, equity investments and guarantees ($53bn in FY 2012) have provided countless opportunities for developing countries to express their gratitude over the years the largesse has done little to reverse the recent trend of farmers being evicted from their land by foreign investors

With the third global food price spike in four years now in full swing, the Bank finds itself under renewed pressure from organisations such as Oxfam and the International Land Coalition to use its political clout to address this ongoing scandal.

International Land Coalition, which monitors land-related projects, says that from 2000-10 an estimated 261m of arable land, much of it situated in cash-poor African states, was acquired by foreign investors.

But as UK-based charity Oxfam notes in its recently published report ‘Our Land Our Lives’ two thirds of investors who’ve purchased land in developing countries plan to export everything they produce on it, thereby doing little to alleviate grinding local poverty caused by population displacement.

While the 2008 boom in food prices is widely credited with triggering the subsequent surge in investor interest in land the problem has been exacerbated by some investors taking tracts of land out of productive use in the hope of making a quick profit as capital values continue climb.

Yet even where land is being put to full use, food for export often plays second fiddle to the production of crops that can be used to make biofuels to power cars – prompted in part by the potential business opportunities seen following the EU’s insistence that 10 percent of all transport fuel must come from plant-based biofuels by 2015.

In Liberia alone, an estimated 30 percent of the land has been carved out in large-scale concessions in the past five years, often with disastrous results for local people, according to data from the Centre for International Conflict Resolution at America’s Columbia University.

Putting the issue in an even starker context Oxfam says that in the past decade an area of land eight times the size of the UK – or 1.44m sq km – has been sold off globally as sales have rapidly accelerated – land that could have potentially fed an estimated 1bn people.

In poor countries, this has equated to buying an area of land the size of London (1570 sq km) every six days.

With rich countries looking to secure their food and fuel supplies and investors viewing land as a good long-term bet Oxfam is calling on the World Bank to implement a number of measures including a six months freeze on all of the organisation’s projects involving or enabling agricultural large-scale land acquisitions.

It also calling for local communities to be informed about and be able to give or refuse consent to a project, and be compensated for any loss of land or livelihoods.

In addition, investors should be held accountable both to affected communities and to the government. Governments meanwhile will need improve land tenure governance, as well as increase local communities’ security of land tenure.

All very laudable of course. But the World Bank’s political influence only goes so far. Overcoming the vested interests that have bred this scandal will prove a tough nut to crack.

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.