India on course for economic stability

With rapid growth in India over the last decade, building the infrastructure is seen as vital in order to cement the country’s place as a …

With rapid growth in India over the last decade, building the infrastructure is seen as vital in order to cement the country’s place as a thriving destination for global business. Although much of India’s financial business is done in Mumbai, Delhi and Bangalore, these financial centres suffer from a muddled infrastructure system built over many decades. A vast number of Indian cities seem old and unappealing to international business when compared to relatively modern financial hubs like Dubai, Singapore or Hong Kong.

India has plans to address these concerns. Hugely ambitious proposals include the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) project, which will see 24 new cities built within a corridor that stretches from New Delhi to the current financial hub in Mumbai, as well as greatly improved transport infrastructure. The corridor will pass through the eastern part of the state of Gujarat – a state popular with investors due to its relative lack of red tape, and the strong inclination to become a global business centre.

“The implementation of phase one of the project has already started and we are developing nearly 13 million square-feet of Built Up Area (BUA)”

Part of the state’s ambitious plans include a new city known as the Gujarat International Finance Tech-City (GIFT), that will seek to be a global financial destination to rival Dubai and Singapore. The city will be built on 886A of land in the centre of the state, and hopes to attract financial and technology firms from other Indian cities including Mumbai, Bangalore and Gurgaon. Funded through a partnership between the government of Gujarat and the privately held company Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services (IL&FS), it is hoped that all phases of the city will be completed by the end of 2020.

An ideal location
Ramakant Jha, the director in charge of the GIFT project, says Gujarat is the perfect place for such a development because of the improvements to the infrastructure: “First and foremost is the entrepreneurial skill that Gujarat possesses. Secondly the development of Gujarat is based on the focus in the area on the development of infrastructure. This helps to connect the businesses in the various parts of the state. That is one of the strong points that the state is doing well.” The region currently has one international airport, as well as 14 that operate domestically.

Part of the benefits of the region to business is the availability of numerous natural ports, which act as a gateway to the rich, landlocked northern and central parts of India, and provide access to the major port-based countries including the UK, Australia, China, Japan, and Korea. “That really helps the manufactures and the service providers connect to the rest of the world and send their goods in a very timely and cost-effective way.” He says that Gujarat is “spearheading the Indian march for global economic superpower status,” and that the region has been dubbed the ‘Growth Engine of India.’ This is reflected in the fact that Gujarat alone contributes 16 percent of all of India’s industrial production.
The GIFT project is an opportunity for the region to create an international financial hub, rivalling many throughout the world. It’s an ambitious plan, but one that Jha believes is vital for India to have a recognised financial centre that businesses want to move to: “This is the first time in India that this particular type of centre has been recognised as an International Financial Service Centre (IFSC). Whereas there are IFSCs in London, Dubai, Singapore and Hong Kong, there is no IFSC in India. This is the first time the government in India has recognised this particular city and region as an IFSC. In the future, all the foreign exchange transactions that have not until recently been done in India, can now be conducted in here.”

Utilising the local economy
In the past, large financial deals involving Indian companies usually happened outside of the country. “The recent deal where Tata took over Corus, the entire financial deal had to close in the UK. It could not borrow the foreign exchange in India, in order to pay for the company in the UK. It was not able to borrow in India because the regulators did not permit it and there was not an international financial centre. With a recognised financial centre in India, the deal could have happened here, and they would have been able to borrow at a lower cost and conclude the deal very fast.”

Jha adds that with so many cash-rich Indian companies going out in the world, an international financial city in India is vital for them to realise the benefits. “The first opportunities will come from the Indian companies, because they are the ones with a lot of cash on hand and they are the ones that are going outside India to buy other companies.”
Competing with these financial cities is not something that the GIFT team is focusing on.

Jha says the city will instead complement them. “We feel that going forward our city will synergise with other financial centres because of the time differences to other centres. India’s position can help the others work around the clock. We do not see ourselves competing.”

The project has seen considerable enthusiasm from the financial sector, which Jha believes is due to the confidence already in place in the region. “Gujarat has started to become very user and business friendly. The number of companies that are putting their offices and businesses in Gujarat has been steadily increasing.

“It really helps that there is already the confidence which was brought into this state, by the steps the government has taken. The confidence is already there, so we are trying to combine this confidence and the strength of the government’s infrastructure development into an internationally recognised hub for financial services.”

Steady investment
Attracting businesses to the region has begun, with a burgeoning auto-industry already in place. Jha says: “Because of foreign investment, a lot of automobile businesses are doing very well here. You have a lot of foreign manufacturers, like Ford and Peugeot, basing the manufacturing plants here. The Tata Motors Nano plant has meant a lot of manufacturers have moved here. We also have other companies, including Bombardier.” Other firms investing in the city include Chinese technology manufacturer Huawei, which is set to provide the technological infrastructure.

Progress in building the city was held up initially by the slow process of persuading all interested parties that a project of this magnitude was right for the region. Launched in 2007, the original plan was to have the city operational by 2017. Delays pushed that back by a couple of years, and now it’s expected to be completed by 2020. Jha says, however, that “acceptance is now there and it is really moving ahead very fast.”

Some criticism of the project came from groups that felt it would ruin the landscape of the region. Jha says GIFT recognise the importance of the agricultural sector in the state, and as land is increasingly valuable, it has looked to make the most out of what land is available. The development will build vertically, while including green spaces around the high-rises, even though the land being built on was formerly a wasteland.

With phase one already underway, this stage should be completed over the coming year. “In terms of the GIFT development, the entire master plan for the project has been finalised. The implementation of phase one of the project has already started and we are developing nearly 13 million square-feet of Built Up Area (BUA). The whole development project will go up to 62 million square-feet BUA, and provide all of the necessary infrastructure like water; roads; district cooling systems; power; waste management; and ICT infrastructure, all provided by the company.”

GIFT does not intend to simply build a business hub, however. It recognises the importance of developing a city that offers more than just business opportunities – but also as a place to live, says Jha: “Our main focus is to develop the global financial hub and the central business district first. However, we also feel that if you develop the central business district in isolation, it does not help people to have a work life in one place. What we are doing is planning an integrated development that includes residential areas; a hotel; a club; an international school; and a golf course.”

GIFT also hopes that its success will act as inspiration for other financial hubs to be built throughout India. The contribution that the hub will generate for the government is considerable. GIFT say that by 2020 there will be one million people employed, directly and indirectly, in the city. It will also generate $10bn a year in foreign exchange.
For a region that was decimated just a decade ago, it is encouraging to see such enthusiasm for India’s regeneration.

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.