Johannesburg Stock Exchange supports African commodities; trading grows

As financial crises go, the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE), Africa's biggest bourse and one of the world's top ten exchanges, had a pretty good one. Michael Dynes reports

As financial crises go, the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE), Africa’s biggest bourse and one of the world’s top ten exchanges, had a pretty good one. Michael Dynes reports

After the great fall of 2008, which saw share values plummet to record lows in March 2009, recovery took hold and began to gain momentum. Within six months, and despite the toughest market conditions in living memory, the JSE All Share Index had bounced back 50 percent by November, and has since continued on its upward trajectory.

The value of equities traded on the 123 year-old exchange in the year to March had risen six percent to more than R283.9bn ($38.59bn), a record that confirms earlier indications that foreign investors were returning in ever larger numbers. Foreign investors have been net buyers of South Africa equities, accounting for R75bn in inflows for the year. Russell Loubser, JSE CEO, characterised the performance as “resilient despite tough trading conditions”.

As global markets continue to recover, however, and the threat of a double dip recedes, the outlook for 2010 is better than anyone could have dreamed of twelve months ago. There are now clear indications that portfolio flows into Africa as a whole are drifting upwards, and expectations are mounting that this will trigger a renewed and sustained interest in African listed securities.

African project finance deals pulled in considerably in excess of $12bn in 2009, and there is confidence in project finance circles that 2010 could be a very good year – possibly even exceeding the all-time record of $18.4bn in 2007. The IMF and World Bank, along with other development finance institutions, have ramped up support for African economies, while private equity investors are increasingly seeing Africa as a new source of growth.

The South African rand (ZAR) is widely seen as a commodity bellwether currency. An appreciating rand is an indication that global risk appetite is buoyant. By the beginning of April, the currency had rallied 30 percent since January 2009, and the JSE reported that South Africa had attracted R130bn in net purchases of its stocks and bonds over the same period. Can it last?
 
Bright horizons
Everything, obviously, depends on what happens to the global economy, and while economists invariably haggle over the finer points of recovery, there appears to be a growing consensus that the recovery is likely to be sustained – if somewhat patchy – but unlikely to be knocked off course by a seemingly endless series of mini panics that have followed the Lehman Brothers collapse – from Greek debt to Goldman Sachs fraud and Icelandic volcanoes.

In South Africa growth is forecast to be within a three to 3.5 percent range for the next few years. In Africa, the prospects look somewhat better at between four and five percent in 2010, rising to six and seven percent in 2011. The outlook for China and the rest of Asia is considerably more robust, which should help to compensate for the flat performance in more developed economies – especially Europe and Japan.

The next decade could indeed be a prosperous one, although not on the scale experienced in the heady years of the 1990s and most of the new millennium’s first decade. Little wonder, then, that Loubser is positioning the JSE to capitalise on African economic growth prospects in the years ahead.

The JSE’s Africa strategy aims, over the medium to long-term, to promote the development and growth of African capital markets, while at the same time positioning itself as the gateway for global investors seeking access to investment opportunities throughout the African continent as its own economic development gathers momentum.

Alongside the JSE’s Mainboard, where most of the exchange’s 400 companies with a collective market capitalisation of around $182bn are listed, and the AltX, the more turbulent listing for small and mid-cap companies, Johannesburg now has a new Africa Board, launched in the early part of 2009. Admittedly, there are, as yet, only two listings – Trustco and Wilderness Safaris – but talks are underway with others and more listings are expected to follow later this year.

The Africa Board is designed to create a platform for top African companies to list on their home exchanges – there are now 23 domestic stock exchanges across Africa including two regional ones – while at the same time dual listing on the JSE. The objective is to build a continental hub and spoke system of connections between Africa’s increasing number of electronic bourses, capable of routing buy and sell orders and data between African exchanges, and thereby developing new business and markets.

The JSE’s African strategy is not without its critics. Johannesburg sees itself as the hub, and other potential participants in Nigeria, Kenya, Namibia, Ghana, Botswana and the like, as the spokes. Most countries north of the Limpopo are already wary of South Africa’s industrial might and financial sophistication, and are hesitant about those advantages being further reinforced. All would like to turn the JSE’s hub and spoke strategy on its head.

At the same time, most are sufficiently realistic to appreciate that countries such as Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe or even Nigeria will never rival Johannesburg, and the advantages of linking up with the JSE far outweigh the damage done to national pride and vanity by bowing to the inevitable. Moreover, the JSE’s African strategy is still in its formative stages. If it can help attract global investors and bring in fresh capital flows to finance Africa’s economic development, then the price would be well worth paying.

In addition to its long-term aspirations to be a driver of African economic growth, the JSE also harbours more immediate ambitions to become a global centre of mining finance. Mick Davies, Xstrata CEO, who has transformed the London-listed company which had a market value of $500m eight years ago in to a $50bn globally diversified miner today, told Johannesburg’s Wits Business School in April that South Africa was confronting its biggest commercial opportunity since the discovery of diamonds and gold in the late nineteenth century.

Davies insists that the commodities supercycle, which saw prices for oil, copper and other key commodities hit historic peaks in the middle of 2008 prior to the onset of the financial crisis, is still with us – it’s just hidden from view. He is adamant that the most significant feature of the mining industry’s downturn has been the extent to which demand has not been diluted. Moreover, he maintains, the results of constrained supply and strong demand are set to reassert themselves.

Continued urbanisation and industrialisation in developing countries lay behind the rapid recovery in base metals, such as copper which fell to $2,800 a tonne in January 2009 but which was back above $8,000 a tonne by March 2010. Against this background, Davies says, the eyes of the world are turning to Africa’s prodigious mineral resources, including the vast untapped wealth of the Democratic Republic of Congo, which will need to be developed in order to satisfy global demand.

This, says Davies, creates a fantastic opportunity for South Africa to become the centre of finance for African mining developments, providing that the two key obstacles – legal and regulatory – currently inhibiting the emergence of that role can be removed. The first is that foreign inward listings do not enjoy full indexation on the JSE. The second is South African exchange controls.

At present, foreign companies are encouraged to list on the JSE. But unless they are classified as domestic companies, their shares are not indexed, and therefore not fully tradable. Anglo American, BHP Billiton, and SA Breweries, for example, all have dual listings, and are classified as South African companies, so their shares are indexed and fully tradable. All had to obtain prior approval from the South African Treasury and the South African Reserve Bank in order to do so. That permission is given on a case-by-case basis. It is not automatic. But there is little point in a company listing on the JSE unless its shares are fully tradable. Consequently, few bother.

The other restriction is exchange controls. While capital controls have been greatly relaxed since the advent of black majority rule in 1994, they continue to exist. But without the free flow of capital, both in and out of the country, investors will never be fully confident that they can exit whenever they choose.

Davies wants to see both these restrictions removed, and Loubser is one of his biggest cheer leaders. The government in Pretoria, however, fears that abolition of the listings restriction would enable South African citizens to externalise their assets. Abolition of exchange controls would remove one of the few obstacles that prevented South African banks and other investors from exposing themselves to exotic products like subprime mortgages, which brought the western banking system to its knees.

Amidst all this complexity, a few things are certain. Africa will grow, South Africa will play a pivotal part in that growth, and few are positioned to benefit more from that growth than the JSE. The abolition of listing restrictions and exchange controls will probably speed up the process. But the end result will be the same.

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.