Between bailout and bankruptcy

There has been anguish for almost every region since the global financial crisis struck in 2008, but political will and effective policy will prevent further torment, writes Shoyeb Ali

Irrelative of bullish or bearish tagging, the year 2011 will be remembered predominantly as a year where market volatility reached its peak. The year was marked by a period of international institutions bailing out countries within the eurozone, in comparison to the preceding years, which were marked by governments structuring bailouts for the ‘too big to fail’ banks. There were several economies, especially in the eurozone, which posed a big but meaningful question: whether they should go bankrupt or be bailed out? Either way, it was clear that taking daredevil risks had not paid off and governments were forced to act quickly, often taking decisions that were knowingly going to be bad for their economies in the short-term. In a sense, the whole story made us realise that extravagancy is going to cost sooner or later.

On the GCC side, six markets also followed a similar downward trend, though they performed much better than in the previous two difficult years

To make the situation worse, until the beginning of 2010, it was commonly believed that emerging economies would supersede developed nations and provide much needed impetus for the global GDP. But these expectations proved futile once cracks appeared in their growth strategies, such as a high reliance on exports, self-inflicting domestic issues of inflation, high interest rates, fuelling asset prices and the general weakening of currencies.

Not that the developed nations fared any better. The US struggled on many fronts such as unemployment, a sovereign downgrading (from S&P), a weakening dollar and bumpy economic growth. Many once prolific eurozone countries found themselves at the summit of financial turbulence, becoming famous once again but for all the wrong reasons.

Europe, conceivably, vacillating on the brink of collapse, did not leave much on the table for investors’ joy. Escalating debt problems, which for many turned into a depression, was not just limited to Europe, it spread like contagion, where most global equity markets could not cross their 2010 closing level and ended the year on the red turf under the dark shadow of negative economic outlook.

Performance of equity markets
Surprisingly, the FTSE 100 minimised its cumulative yearly losses by witnessing a couple of healthy trading sessions at the end of 2011, while the NYSE restricted its downfall on account of encouraging Q3 results, driven by improving personal consumption, non-resident investments, growing exports and government spending.

In the BRIC category the Bovespa index of Brazil was the best performer whereas the Russian market did not fare so well despite an impressive return of 20 percent plus by June 2011, meeting a crucial fate at the end of the year, predominantly due to the eurozone crisis and uprising confusion over Putin’s presidency candidature, which muddles investors’ decisions to invest in the market.

On the GCC side, six markets also followed a similar downward trend, though they performed much better than in the previous two difficult years. Regardless of economic comfort from strong oil prices, a continuity of weakening investment in Europe and the US, specifically relating to strong sectors in the UAE, elicited pains to the GCC region.

Limited operations, vast investments in the US, Europe and UK markets and huge exposure to their depressed local real estate continuously weighed down on the GCC markets. Corporations continue to face immense difficulties to get returns on their investments as buyers refrain from working within these sectors. Moreover, debts are now seen as an integral part of corporate finances, making the lending environment tough and stressful for the management who cannot operate their businesses with free will.

Poor investment conditions
In this region, Qatar was the lone positive performer while the other countries ended the year on a negative note. In contrast to last year’s positive performance, Kuwait’s Weighted Index reported a double digit dip of 16.4 percent, mainly steered by political turmoil at local level as well as geo-political tensions in the region. The performance was sluggish despite the government’s commitment to implement new investor-friendly Capital Market Authority (CMA) rules.

Comprehensively, the year was severely impacted by the chaos in the Middle East, natural disasters in Japan, eurozone debt drama, the downgrading of the US and by the overall decrease of trade across the globe. In 2011, most of the economists predicted that measures taken by the US and Europe, to avoid the debt crisis, would put the jobs and consumption pattern back on path. However, the tide took a different turn and the year yielded negative results in all markets; economic stability was clearly missing. The investors’ community, in general, could not find much return anywhere as equity, gold, commodities, real estate, debt or any other investment commodity could not perform. To add even more pain to the situation investors are losing out on their nominal saving rate by rising inflation.

The outlook for 2012
In lieu of all current developments, ranging from market trading to other interrelated macro and micro aspects, the year 2012 will be a decisive year in terms of achieving growth (or embracing a deeper recession) Indeed, the fate depends upon the policymakers’ attitude and their sincere efforts to move policy in the right direction.

At the beginning of 2012, the world’s major economies are facing four major challenges on the ‘war against recession.’ These include: slow and inconsistent GDP growth; disagreement over policy implementation; diminishing trade; and confusion over inflation rates. It has been quite clear that global growth will be moderate in 2012 with advanced economies  projected to grow at an anemic pace amid rising fiscal imbalance, sustained high unemployment and political uncertainty. In reality, an uncertain environment dominated by the sovereign debt crisis is impeding new investments, which in turn is impacting corporate growth and profitability. To add further woe, the borrowing, in general taken for business expansion or to kick off a new one, is also becoming a herculean task.

Furthermore, the depleting corporate performance is restricting the prospects of new job creation, which is directly linked to overall consumer confidence and spending. On the European side, the rising fear of non-performing assets is paving way for a downgrade fear to various renowned and international organisations. And, if the debt disruption is not settled soon with strict financial discipline, the most powerful economies of the eurozone may face a downgrade rating on their sovereign bonds, which may convert into a significant risk to overall global financial stability.

Strategies for growth
On the Asian side, hopes of surviving the financial crisis are more prosperous despite the slowdown in 2010 in lieu of multiple factors weighing down on their trajectory growth path. Commodity-oriented economies, like Russia, accelerated its pace due to strong oil prices, however, the current situation in Russia is no more promising than it was a year ago due to political uncertainty and unwelcome business atmosphere.

In the MENA region nothing concrete can be achieved if governments keep spending on public finance and feeding subsidies instead of diverting funds towards constructive projects

China and India emerged as true jewels by posting solid growth numbers even during the tough times. China carried on hefty government spending and profited from cheap exports to the western world whereas India continued with robust domestic consumption.

However, the growth story of these two countries does not remain certain, given the eurozone crisis and its impact on other economies. In addition, China is witnessing a slowdown in investments whereas India is fighting high domestic inflation and rising interest rates which are ultimately negating the corporate profitability and its currency strength.

On the GCC side, high oil prices have continued to provide financial muscle to oil exporters who have experienced the unwanted side effect of it impacting upon their trade accounts. Furthermore, political unrest in many countries has worsened their economic parameters as witnessed in Egypt, Tunisia and Syria. Exporters have deep pockets; yet their respective markets were seen trapped in a nervous disposition that could not release these nations from diminishing returns.

In the MENA region nothing concrete can be achieved if governments keep spending on public finance and feeding subsidies instead of diverting funds towards constructive projects. Also, high oil prices do not guarantee that everything is ‘in-order’ at home, given the external links of all oil economies, especially to Europe and East Asia.

In a nutshell, the outlook varies from zone to zone, though in general the current developments hints at a recession over growth. The trouble in the eurozone cannot be denied and geo-political imbalances will continue to hamper market and investment sentiments due to the globalisation of economies. Emerging economies are trying their best to boost global growth, however they have their own limitations too. Despite this, if correct economic growth policies are drafted and implemented with a touch of sincerity, it won’t be a surprise to see black numbers back on the global economic boards.

Shoyeb Ali is Vice President – Investment Research at Muthanna Investment Company

Tags:
Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.