Caixa drives Portuguese investment

A privatisation programme is expected to act as a catalyst for the regeneration of capital markets and M&A activity in Portugal, restoring confidence in the country’s financial stability

Portugal is currently facing a challenging economic context, as long-standing structural weaknesses and macro-economic imbalances crossed paths with the global financial crisis.

The country has found itself with a chronic government deficit and a growing public debt, aggravated by the difficult financial market conditions and culminating in high funding costs leading to a situation where neither the government, nor the international markets, could provide the necessary incentives for economic growth.

In 2010 the Portuguese government put in place a Stability and Growth Programme for the 2010-2013 period to face the sovereign debt and public deficit issues with several austerity measures. However, the growing difficulties of obtaining the necessary financing led Portugal, in April 2011, to request financial assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the European Commission (EC) and the European Central Bank (ECB). The assistance comprised a financial package of €78bn in credit, to be disbursed until 2014 but contingent on the achievement of certain goals and the implementation of several structural measures agreed between the parts in the Economic Adjustment Programme, aiming to contribute to a long-term sustainable growth of the Portuguese economy.

One of the measures agreed with the IMF, EC and ECB was the establishment of a goal of €5bn in privatisation proceeds between 2011 and 2014, through the acceleration of the privatisation plan already in progress, including companies in the energy, aviation, transport infrastructure, communications, shipbuilding and financial sectors.

The privatisation programme soon became one of the flagships of public debt reduction, as well as of the adjustment programme itself and with the government putting great effort, not only into the fulfilment of its obligations, but also into working toward beating the goals established by the IMF, EC and ECB.

The balance so far could hardly be better and has certainly beaten expectations: since the revitalisation of the privatisation plan in 2010, the Portuguese state has achieved sale proceeds of around €4bn, including Galp’s €0.9bn exchangeable bonds issue in 2010. The most recent privatisation plan has been focused on the energy sector – namely with the sale of 21.35 percent of EDP (energy generation, distribution and supply), the sale of 40 percent in REN (power grid operator) and, in 2010, the issue of Galp Energia (oil and gas) exchangeable bonds. All operations have been regarded by stakeholders as successful, not only in financial terms but also in terms of transparency, contribution to the companies involved and positive impacts on the Portuguese economy.

Exchangeable bonds
Galp Energia’s fifth reprivatisation phase was carried out through the issue of exchangeable bonds due 2017, worth €885m.

Concluded in September 2010, the issue was the largest for an equity-linked product in Portugal since 2007, and the largest non-bank issue in the first nine months of 2010 in EMEA, representing a premium of 25 percent to the market value of Galp Energia shares at that time.

The operation’s high demand exceeded market expectations and was extremely successful from Portugal’s perspective. Not only did Portugal execute the fifth reprivatisation phase of Galp Energia while retaining dividends and voting rights during an additional period of up to seven years, but it was also able to raise more than €885m at a relatively low funding cost during the same period, with a coupon rate of 5.25 percent, more than 35 basis points below the Portuguese seven-year government bond yield.

Recent privatisations
The two most recent privatisations are EDP’s eighth reprivatisation phase – through the direct sale of a 21.35 percent equity stake (€2.69bn) – and REN’s second reprivatisation phase, via two direct sales totalling 40 percent of the company’s share capital (€592m).

These deals have marked the beginning of the privatisation programme established in the Economic Adjustment Programme, fulfilling, against all expectations, around two thirds of the global goal of €5bn. The structuring of both sale processes has allowed for the maximisation of Portugal’s financial goals, while coping with the highly demanding schedule, lasting just five months. In fact, the financial outcome was remarkable not only in terms of the amount received by the state, but also in terms of the financial and economic contributions to both companies as well as to the Portuguese economy more broadly, included in the investment package proposed by the winning bidders.

Such an outcome was possible due to the ability to structure a global and competitive process, having attracted interest from three different continents, including some of the largest energy companies in the world, such as China Three Gorges (China), E.ON (Germany), Eletrobras (Brazil), Cemig (Brazil), State Grid (China) and from renowned energy funds such as Brookfield and Oman Oil.

The winning bidder in the sale of EDP’s 21.35 percent stake was China Three Gorges, China’s largest clean energy group, for a price of €3.45 per share, representing a 53.6 percent premium over EDP’s pre-transaction market price, and making it the biggest privatisation ever in Portugal. The deal package also included an investment of €2bn in EDP’s renewable energy assets, a firm funding commitment to EDP of another €2bn and a strong commitment in the creation of an R&D centre and the potential establishment of a wind turbine plant in Portugal.

In the case of REN, a solid shareholder structure was built with two new strategic partners, by selling a 25 percent stake to State Grid, the world’s largest utility and operator of the Chinese power grid, and a 15 percent stake to Oman Oil, a sovereign fund that has positioned itself as a long-term financial partner of REN. The success of the operation is evident in the combined 34 percent premium over REN’s pre-transaction market price, in the access to a €1bn credit facility for REN, and in the strategic partnerships signed, which will contribute to the company’s growth and internationalisation strategy.

Strategic vision
According to the Portuguese Government, several privatisations are expected to be initiated during 2012, namely in important companies such as TAP (flag carrier airline), Caixa Seguros (insurance and healthcare), CTT (postal services), ANA (airport management), CP Carga (rail freight transport), Águas de Portugal (water distribution) and RTP (television). Since all these companies are currently 100 percent owned by public entities, it is expected that the privatisations may take several different structures, including a combination of public offers, private placements and strategic sales.

The recently completed privatisations have mitigated the fear that Portuguese companies could no longer attract foreign investors in the current economic context. It seems that the solid strategies conducted by Portuguese companies during the last years, together with well-managed M&A and capital markets transactions and the recent positive developments on the Portuguese macro-economic environment, are the necessary ingredients for a successful privatisation programme.

In spite of current investor sentiment over the European peripheral economies such as Portugal, our experience tells us that there is always room for good investment opportunities. Although more selective in uncertain times, investors are always looking for companies with growth potential, and most Portuguese companies have been doing their homework over the past years by focusing on business and geographical risk diversification. More specifically, many Portuguese companies were able to create sustainable growth strategies and can allow investors to gain access to booming Portuguese-speaking economies such as Brazil, Angola and Mozambique.

We strongly believe that the Portuguese Privatisation Programme will present interesting opportunities to investors and that all ingredients are met to allow privatisations to set a new dynamic in the Portuguese economy, which considering the difficult credit market conditions, will be an important catalyst to unlock other operations from the private sector, through the injection of liquidity into companies, the creation of specific business opportunities ancillary to the core privatisation operations, and the increase in investor confidence. An active privatisation programme may be pivotal in unlocking internationalisation strategies, corporate restructuring measures and M&A plans that were just waiting for a sustainable change in the environment.

For more information: www.caixabi.pt

Tags:
Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.