Mining the future

Ecuador offers some of the world’s top opportunities underground

In the turbulent second half of 2011, a lower price of oil sounded an alert for Ecuador. Fears of a double-dip recession triggered memories of 2008, when the South American OPEC member suffered from the fall in oil prices, fewer remittances from overseas and shrinking export markets. Against that backdrop, there is no better time than the present to finally bring to fruition the country’s vast mining potential. What could be more beneficial for an oil exporter than 36.9 million ounces of gold, that most sacred of safe haven metals, worth some $68bn in September 2011?

Actually having working mines to monetise the resource, that’s what. Currently only Canada’s Dynasty Minerals is pouring gold (ignoring the small, often illegal mines that endanger both their workers and the environment). The self-styled socialist government of President Rafael Correa has been pledging to develop major open-pit mines since taking office in 2007. But a moratorium on large-scale mining in 2008 stymied development, as did problems in defining priorities for foreign direct investment and contract terms. Diplomatic issues ranging from treatment of a Brazilian construction company to the expulsion of the US ambassador and the rescinding of bilateral investment treaties and international arbitration mechanisms further clouded the outlook.

Realising potential
But the idling of the country’s huge potential has been anything but satisfactory. After a four-year learning process, the government has become serious about kick-starting mining in a way compatible with corporate and market needs. By 2015, the government wants to make large-scale mining a reality – an ambitious but attainable goal. Analytica, which was appointed to the World Finance 100 last year thanks to the company’s keen research and understanding of its home market, believes that Ecuador has finally turned the corner to unlocking its mineral wealth. This offers potentially huge benefits to investors, from whom Analytica has already seen keen interest.

The new regulatory environment demands higher taxes than other major mining countries, given that the constitution mandates that “at least 50 percent” of earnings be taxed in some form. This however includes the 15 percent distribution of profits to workers mandatory for all companies in the country, which has been applied without major issues in other industries including oil. Factoring that out, the taxes – including the soon-to-be 22 percent corporate income tax – become competitive.

The government has also wisely dropped its earlier idea of modelling mining contracts on those recently signed with oil companies in a troubled process that contributed to fears of nationalisations. Mining companies instead face a 70 percent windfall tax if prices go above base prices negotiated in their contracts. In negotiations with the oil companies, however, the government showed leniency and agreed to realistic prices. It may also reduce value-added taxes in mining. Contract negotiations with Ecuacorrientes, International Minerals, Iamgold, and Kinross, are at an advanced stage; all were originally Canadian, but Ecuacorrientes was bought out by the China Railway Construction Corporation (CRCC) and Tongling Nonferrous Metals. There is real interest in the Correa administration to unlock revenue streams from mining against the backdrop of risky oil prices and an election campaign in 2012. Correa has said that he expects companies to advance some $200m in royalties before the mines enter operation in three or four years.

Strong negotiating positions
Other open issues include the exact level of the royalty – Correa wants eight percent, the firms have offered six percent – and the site of arbitration. Ecuador wants its domestic courts to handle controversies, matching a constitutional mandate, but has shown some flexibility with oil supply deals with China on this matter. And unlike the oil industry, Ecuador has no local expertise in major mining, which strengthens the companies’ negotiating position. Analysts are therefore sanguine about Oil Minister Wilson Pastor’s warning that the government might decide to offer their concessions to other companies (with compensation) if the contracts aren’t signed swiftly.

In the medium term, new entrants will be able to benefit from the precedent of firms already present. Chilean state copper giant Codelco has announced its intent to explore four properties, and Analytica has already advised a client on a mining deal in Ecuador.

Beyond its gold, Ecuador estimates reserves of 72.4 million ounces of silver, 8.1 million tons of copper, 28,471 tonnes of lead, and 209,649 tonnes of zinc, among other metals and minerals. To exploit them, the government expects $37bn in investment over the coming 20 years. Only 44 percent of the country’s 272,046 sq km of territory have been explored, so significant additional deposits may yet be discovered.

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.