Foreign investment through effective investor relations

Business modernisation in rapidly growing economies is appealing to numerous international investors, who are shying away from the economic situation in Europe and the US

An increasing number of investors are turning their hand to international markets to harvest cross-border opportunities. Now more than ever, it has become crucial for companies to use their investor relations to connect with oversees governments to help fully comprehend practices abroad. Staying on top of quickly changing market regulations and government laws that influence cross-border transactions and other trades has become paramount in ensuring best practice.

Two nations that particularly stand out for having undergone profound transformation due to tectonic alterations in global trading are China and Russia. Their relationship with European and other international corporations has solidified lately, guaranteeing a strong and active future.

Modern Russia
As developed countries increasingly lag in growth, emerging economies are experiencing increased consideration from foreign investors. A recent study by Ernst & Young found that the country’s buoyant consumer market is among the key reasons why companies seize “the opportunity to manufacture consumer goods and sell them to Russia’s emerging middle class.”

Russia’s new image shows a picture of improved logistics, clearer regulations, and an inexpensive workforce: all facets that make it a prime investment target. The transformation comes as its federal government introduces significant changes to promote a more rational, conventional and solid climate for investments and regulations. New and officially institutionalised techniques of interaction and dialogue have ensured substantial gains for international investors within Russia. Several factors such as the selection of an Investment Ombudsman with Igor Shuvalov at its helm, and a revived Foreign Investment Advisory Council (FIAC), showed the government’s commitment to change. All of these changes came as part of President Medvedev’s newly introduced manifesto, which promised to modernise Russia through improved investor relations, clearer laws and regulations, and by further opening the country to foreign investors.

Medvedev’s modernisation manifesto looks to reduce the nation’s dependency on oil and gas revenues by creating a diversified economy that simplifies transactions for international investors and focuses more on innovation and high technology. As part of the manifesto, procurement expenditure of large state-owned corporations is to be reduced by 10 percent within the next three years. Also, the Ministry of Economic Development will get further powers to be able to repeal state agency regulations that unjustifiably obstruct business and investment activity. It will have the authority to demand the revocation of any anti-business regulations in question.

Equal opportunities
The attempt to deal with foreign investors in the same manner as domestic ones has now been more frequently accomplished through bilateral political dialogue. Additional factors that have advanced the manner in which cross border business transactions are handled have included direct federal contacts, negotiation, and mediation through diplomacy.

Russia profited from the Investment Ombudsman, which allowed foreigners with significant investments to better structure their affiliation with the government. The creation of presidential mobile reception offices, which are to act on information received from companies and individuals concerning the actions and inactions of government authorities, has also been highly effective. Most recently the FIAC has played a vital role in public-private dialogue and has made state regulation possible. It now ensures that certain measures are put into practice to maintain the enhanced investor relations and investment climate.

Additional changes implemented include an electronic customs declarations system, and a reduction of customs duties on agricultural raw materials and equipment for food production. The FIAC also provided expert counsel during the expansion of the bill concerning foreign investments in strategic enterprises, on patent agents, and on technology transfers. It has taken on a more operational role and is set to change further, with the introduction of think tanks within its network to aid further public-private dialogue.

Russia’s foreign direct investment in the first half of this year skyrocketed 29 percent over the same period in 2010, to $7bn. Particular emphasis has been noted in sectors including energy, telecoms, automotive, and food manufacturing.

Retail trade is expanding at an annual rate of about five percent and food comprises around half of the entire retail sector. An estimated 40 percent of food consumed in Russia is imported. It is no surprise then that the country has recently observed a heavy influx of Western manufacturers including the likes of Pepsi, Fazer, Coca-Cola, and Valio. They have spent billions in investments as they look to reap the benefits stemming from the country’s growth.

The issue with China
Russia’s key contenders for foreign investment come from its fellow BRICS nations, particularly China, and to some degree India.

Chinese foreign direct investment is also steadily and significantly on the rise. Figures published by European officials for the first half of 2011 showed bilateral trades accumulated to record numbers, with EU exports to China up 22 percent and imports from China up 12 percent year-on-year.
International investments in factories and ventures in China for the first half of the year to June brought in $60.89bn, almost $10bn more than the $51bn spent in 2010 for that period. Experts say that China’s healthy expansion and its stronger currency are appealing to numerous international investors, who are shying away from the economic situation in Europe and the US.

In a crucial speech in September the European Commissioner for Trade, Karel De Gucht, spoke of the important benefits that are reaped by both Europe and China. This is especially significant as China is now the fastest-growing market for European export of goods and a top EU investment destination. Despite the advances there have been many challenges in business dealings between the two jurisdictions.

De Gucht said: “While Chinese investment into Europe is increasing, important sectors in China remain closed or restricted to EU investors. This is a significant impediment to the realisation of economic gains on both sides. The fundamental imbalance between our openness and China’s restrictiveness plays into the hands of those in Europe who see Chinese investments as a threat and argue that we should selectively screen Chinese investments into the EU.”

Issues in relation to subsidies and state-owned businesses are becoming increasingly important, and go to the heart of the Chinese economic model. Here elemental differences between the two economies become evident. It is these diversities that need to be resolved before an equal playing field with Chinese companies can be attained. Since China’s economic accomplishments are founded on this model, De Gucht feels it will not be easy to resolve. “There is little chance of any quick fix,” he said. “It seems that our dialogue needs to be firm, sustained, and built on convincing arguments. There is a need to take measures to address the imbalances created by them, an issue that is very sensitive for China.”

Europe’s open investment policy remains its strongest argument for other nations to grant it similar treatment and access. The debate grows stronger on whether China is restrictive in its trade and Europe stressed how essential it is for China to engage constructively with international investors.

“For the EU to engage further and consider a bilateral investment agreement we need to be firmly convinced that this will produce real added value for EU companies, both in terms of access to the Chinese market and the way their investments are treated in China,” De Gucht emphasised.

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.