Why we need sustainability reporting

The performance opportunities and cross-sectoral benefits generated by sustainability management and reporting have become even more compelling, writes Abdulkareem A. Abu Alnasr

In 2008, the responsible competitiveness initiatives of the King Khalid Foundation and SAGIA sought to catalyse awareness of sustainability issues. Three years on, I believe the time is now right for leading Saudi corporations to adopt sustainability reporting as the norm. The King Khalid Foundation and the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (SAGIA) instituted the first annual King Khalid Awards for Responsible Competitiveness in 2008. The awards recognise Saudi companies’ achievements in integrating social and environmental goals with business performance. Winners are shortlisted from the Saudi Responsible Competitiveness Index (a detailed annual benchmark analysed by SAGIA), the King Khalid Foundation, and global research organisation AccountAbility.

NCB was the first recipient of the King Khalid Award in 2008 and we are honoured to have won it again in 2009 and 2010. We were also one of the first Saudi companies – and the first financial institution in the region – to issue a sustainability report. We have since published a further three sustainability reports, each accredited by the Amsterdam-based Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), considered the most respected evaluation process for global sustainability reporting.

Still no standards
The King Khalid Foundation and SAGIA’s 2008 initiatives sought to encourage Saudi Arabia’s entire business community to consider the growing competitive importance of a range of economic, social, and environmental issues. They also worked to improve corporate performance in those areas.

But three years on, while many Saudi businesses have advanced their economic, environmental, and social efforts, we have yet to see a corresponding rise in public reporting. Few sustainability reports have been issued, compared to the 20 (GRI accredited) in the UAE, for example; or compared to South Africa, where all listed companies are now required to issue sustainability reports annually.

Why did NCB take the initiative on sustainability reporting? Our reasons for publicly sharing our performance on economic, environmental and social impacts were four-fold. We wanted to:

•   present the case for systematically managing these impacts in creating value;
•   demonstrate business gains from doing so;
•   adopt higher levels of transparency and accountability to our stakeholders on the
issues that matter most to them;
•   create greater awareness of sustainability issues, especially within Saudi Arabia.

Apart from NCB, only a few leading corporations have published sustainability reports. These companies should be commended for adopting the new global benchmark and showing willingness to report openly on activities, achievements, and shortcomings across a broader range of economic, social, and environmental issues.

A missed opportunity
For Saudi Arabia, the lack of take-up in sustainability reporting represents a missed opportunity. Increased adoption of sustainability reporting in Saudi Arabia would help to:

•   illustrate the important foundation work and tracking of economic, environmental, and social performance already being undertaken;
•   accelerate the business community’s understanding of sustainability’s strategic business case and benefits, with companies challenging each other through performance benchmarking;
•   demonstrate verifiable performance on key societal issues in a way that enhances public trust, confidence, and involvement – including the loyalty and engagement of customers and employees.

Now that many leading Saudi companies are systematically tackling these issues, it is time to take the next step and publicly communicate performance to the stakeholders we all serve. Are we capturing the competitive benefits of sustainability for our shareholders? For our customers? For our employees? For the community? For Saudi Arabia and its national competitiveness?

How are we responding to some of our toughest short-term and long-term challenges, be it job creation or ensuring the wisest possible use and stewardship of our natural resources and environment?

Performance transparency helps answer all these questions, allowing us to work more aggressively for gains and to assess our collective progress in achieving sustainable development for the Saudi business community as a whole.

If we subscribe to the idea that public transparency is a performance driver, and acknowledge that we are already doing much of the underlying work of sustainability management and performance tracking, then a reasonable goal would be to mobilise 10 sustainability reports in Saudi Arabia by late 2011 and more than 30 by 2012. Based on the country’s progress in other areas, these goals are realistic.

Considering Saudi business as a whole, a critical mass of performance information will help recognise and reward strong leadership, while raising the bar for all. This will be our collective test to show the next step in our commitment to business competitiveness, our national competitiveness, and the sustainable development of our society as a whole.

What is Sustainability?

There are differing views about how sustainability should be defined. NCB’s definition is in line with many of the world’s leading corporations, and that of the UN’s Brundtland Commission. It includes not only sustainability’s environmental dimensions, but also its social and economic aspects.

Sustainability is about people: harnessing their expertise, creativity, and skills so we can compete successfully. It is also about our relationships with customers, business partners, and the community.

Sustainability is about planet: we hold the environment in trust for future generations and environmental stewardship is embedded in our Islamic values and integral to our corporate culture.

And sustainability is about profit: business cannot exist without creating economic value. Prudent management of risk and good governance are implicit in fulfilling this objective.

Sustainability management is the integrated management of economic, environmental, and social performance with the goal of creating value for all stakeholders. We simply consider it to be the next step in business excellence.


Abdulkareem A. Abu Alnasr is CEO of NCB

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.