The boutique firm offering boutique services

Brink Cohen Le Roux looks to establish a more visible footprint in Africa through cross-border professional services

Our firm has become synonymous with service excellence and specialist advice, which our firm strives to maintain. In seeking to pursue such objectives, we provide value-added solutions with a smaller hands-on team than our larger competitors.

At its formation in 1993, the founding partners shared a common vision to develop a boutique corporate law firm offering specialised knowledge and personalised service with value-added solutions. BCLR believes in optimal outcomes, strengthened by long-term relationships and service excellence at every contact across the firm. The firm’s current vision is to remain a leading South African legal niche firm, committed to meeting its empowerment objectives.

Profile
BCLR is a boutique firm of attorneys offering a full range of legal expertise critical to corporate clients. In each focus area, we offer recognised intellectual leadership and proven commercial acumen, with creative thinking core to our approach. Our ability to understand the rapidly evolving local and regional business environment enables us to assist local clients in the pursuit of global objectives and foreign clients in the structuring and development of their local interests. We service a broadly based multinational corporate client base.

The significant areas of practice of our firm include the following: banking and finance (including debt structuring, financial markets and securities), competition law (anti-trust) and international trade, employment, litigation and ADR, mergers and acquisitions, mining and resources, occupational health and safety, stock exchange and takeover panel law and general commercial and corporate (including flotations, licensing and franchising, mining commercial and sport and entertainment).

We are the South African member firm of Interlaw, an international association of more than 70 independent law firms in 125 business centres worldwide. Interlaw gives our clients direct access to competent and readily accessible local lawyers in all major trade centres, worldwide.

Our firm’s objectives for the near future include, among others:
1. The consolidation of our position as a leading South African legal niche firm
2. The establishment of a more visible footprint in Africa through the provision of cross-border professional services in other African countries.

Companies Act 2008
The South African Companies Act, 2008 (‘New Act’) came into force on May 1, 2011. There is a two year window period for all existing companies until May 1, 2013, to file a new memorandum of incorporation (‘MOI’). In the interim, certain transitional provisions apply. Some of the key aspects of the New Act are the following:

What remains unchanged?
Pre-existing companies continue to exist under the same name and registration number. Existing directors, officers and the auditor continue to hold office. Court proceedings continue and rights and obligations remain in full force and effect.

Alterable provisions
There are many alterable provisions, which allow companies to elect custom-made solutions (e.g. the majority for special resolutions could be more or less than 75 percent) and the majority for ordinary resolutions 50 percent or more, provided there is at least a 10 percent difference between the two levels of approval.

‘Control’
In addition to holding majority voting rights or board control, the ability to influence the policy of the company (e.g. veto rights on key decisions) amounts to “control.”

Shareholders agreement
Still allowed but it will be void to the extent inconsistent with the new Act or the company’s MOI. Existing shareholder agreements should not be amended during the two-year window period. If they are, the two-year moratorium is lost.

Third parties
The doctrine of ‘constructive notice’ (deemed knowledge of MOI) has been abolished except if the company has the letters “RF” (ring-fenced) in its name. Third parties can still assume internal capacity and authority requirements have been complied with (Turquand Rule retained).

Shareholder resolutions
Are required for any amendment of the MOI, (being the only instance where registration is required), ratifying actions by company or directors, authorising financial assistance, reacquisition of shares, voluntary winding-up and fundamental transactions.

Board of directors
Private companies must have at least one director and public companies at least three. Directors must disclose personal financial interests.

Directors’ liability
Directors’ duties are now codified. Directors (including alternates, prescribed officers and members of board committees) incur joint and several personal liability, if they fail to comply with fiduciary duties or the duty to act with care, skill and knowledge. Directors can be declared ‘delinquent’ and blacklisted from becoming a company director.

Fundamental transactions
Disposals by companies of all or greater part of the company’s assets or undertaking, amalgamations or mergers and schemes of arrangement are “fundamental transactions” which require special resolutions and in certain instances, independent expert reports and compliance with the Acts’ solvency and liquidity tests.

Chapter 5 and takeover regulations
Private companies which have transferred more than 10 percent of their securities in the previous 24 months and all public companies must comply with Part B and C of Chapter 5 and the Takeover Regulations. The Takeover Regulation Panel ensures compliance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act. Listed companies also have to comply with the Listings Requirements of the JSE Limited in Johannesburg.

Share buybacks
If five percent or more of the issued shares of a company are being bought back, a scheme of arrangement is required.

Financial assistance
Is allowed in connection with any purchase of or subscription for shares, provided a special resolution is passed, the prescribed solvency and liquidity tests are met and directors satisfy themselves that financial assistance is fair and reasonable. All loans to related and inter-related companies require the same level of approval.

Shareholder remedies
Common law derivative actions have been abolished. Shareholder remedies are now codified in sections 163-165 of the New Act. Shareholders enjoy appraisal rights to demand a buy-out by the underlying company of their shares at fair value if they vote against fundamental transactions and the transaction is approved by the majority. Remedial action is still available for oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

Audit or review
A company’s public interest score determines whether it is obliged to have its annual financial statements (AFS) audited or reviewed. The public interest score is determined by calculating the sum of the following:
a) a number of points equal to the number of employees of the company during the financial year;
b) one point for every ZAR1m in third party liability;
c) one point for every ZAR1m in turnover during the financial year;
d) one point for every individual who has a direct or indirect beneficial interest in the company.

A public company is obliged to have its AFS audited and a private company if its public interest score is: 350 or more; or at least 100, if its AFS were internally compiled.

In summary, South Africa has a well regulated M&A regulatory regime, consisting of the Companies Act, 2008, the Takeover Panel Regulations, the Listings Requirements of the JSE Limited and the Competition Act, 2008. It is comparable to any regulatory environment in developed economies worldwide and backed up by competent and experienced professional advisers.

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.