Peru simplifies its insurance system to attract investors

With the Peruvian economy growing, insuring the country’s future is not just for its residents. Developing new business ventures has generated opportunities for foreign insurance companies, and the clear regulations each must adhere to

Peru’s economy continues to grow at a strong rate, attracting lots of attention from overseas investors. At the end of July 2012 the Wall Street Journal named Peru the ‘New South American Tiger’. Not surprising, as economic authorities reported a 7.07 percent growth for July and issued a conservative projection of 8.7 percent annual growth to be reached by the end of the year.

Growth is driven by finance, and Peru has developed a solid financial system in only a few years. One of the most important pillars of this system is the insurance industry. When new businesses start and substantial loans are made to financial institutions, corporations and individuals, creative risk management becomes indispensable; it is for this reason that Peru has streamlined its insurance system.

Opportunities for foreign insurance companies in Peru have increased considerably, especially in the reinsurance business. With many other areas of economic activity, Peru has enacted clear and brief regulations as part of a national strategy designed to spur growth, and avoid excessive regulatory burdens.

Governing law
Insurance and finance matters in Peru are governed by the Ley General del Sistema Financiero y del Sistema de Seguros (Banking and Insurance Law) and its complementary regulations – the ‘Banking and Insurance Regulations’. Peru’s Superintendence of Banking and Insurance (SBS) is the agency charged with regulating financial entities, insurance companies, and pension funds.

Only insurance companies duly authorised by the SBS may write insurance business in Peru. An important exception to this general rule, however, is the freedom Peruvian residents experience when contracting insurance abroad, that is, outside Peru, with foreign insurance companies.

Article 2(14) of the Peruvian Constitution states ‘any person has the right to contract with lawful purposes, provided no rule of public order is breached.’ In turn, Article 10 of Peru’s Banking and Insurance Law expressly denotes that ‘residents in the country may enter into agreements to contract insurance and reinsurance abroad’. The word ‘abroad’ in this provision is generally understood and applied in practice to enable Peruvian residents to purchase insurance and reinsurance policies issued by foreign companies, not as a reference to the location of the resident purchasing the policies, who may or may not be in Peru.

Neither the Banking and Insurance Law nor the Banking and Insurance Regulations establish any restriction or limitations addressing non-residents. Currently the SBS does not regulate the sale of life insurance policies by brokers issued by foreign companies to
Peruvian residents or non-residents.

Reinsurance activities
In contrast to the regulation of insurance activities, reinsurance business may be written in Peru by qualified non-admitted reinsurers or NARs. Under the Banking and Insurance Law, foreign reinsurance companies may write reinsurance business without registering with the SBS, if they have the required credit rating; or by registering with the SBS and complying with certain specific requirements.

A foreign reinsurance company may write reinsurance business in Peru if it has one of the following credit ratings issued by a recognised international credit rating agency:
If the foreign reinsurance company has not been issued one of the minimum credit ratings, it may still write reinsurance business in Peru by registering with the SBS. Registration with the SBS requires an application attaching the following documents:
- A certificate issued by the competent authority (usually the insurance department) of the company’s country of origin. This must show the company is validly incorporated and existing, and that reinsuring risks abroad is within the scope of its corporate purpose.
- The date in which the company was authorised to commence operations in its country of origin, and the types of risks it reinsures. The certificate must state that the company has no impediment to pay covered risks in freely convertible currency and must be issued 90 calendar days before the application is filed with the SBS.
- A copy of the company’s last balance and financial statements, duly audited by an independent accounting firm. These documents may be in English or Spanish.
- A legalised copy of the company’s Articles of Incorporation and bylaws, certified by the competent authority of the company’s country of origin.
- A Certificate of Good Standing or a similar document issued by the competent authority of the company’s country of origin.
- A copy of the last report issued by a credit rating agency of international reputation.
- A legalised copy of the power of attorney granted by the company to a Peruvian resident or attorney, and duly registered with the Public Registry of Lima, granting him or her full power and authority to act as the company’s legal representative in Peru before the SBS. A copy of the individual’s résumé showing relevant experience in insurance matters must be attached to the power of attorney.
- A sworn statement of the company’s legal representative of not being under any of the impediments listed in the Banking and Insurance Regulations.
- A list of the individuals or companies with which the company is economically related (only major relationships, such as holding companies and controlling ownership).
- Proof that the company has net assets of at least $10m issued by the competent authority of the company’s country of origin.

All documents listed herein must be apostilled or legalised by the Peruvian Consulate with appropriate jurisdiction, and translated into Spanish by a certified public translator.

Cut through clauses
Peruvian law recognises that local insurance companies may need the support of foreign reinsurers embedded in their agreements.  Therefore, there is no law or regulation in Peru that would limit or prohibit the payment by a reinsurer of reinsurance proceeds directly to the original insured.

Under Peruvian law there is no privity of contract between the reinsurer and the original insured. The reinsurer, however, is free to include a cut through provision in the reinsurance agreement providing for direct payment to the original insured. Payment of reinsurance proceeds directly to the original insured or a third party beneficiary, if provided for in the Reinsurance Agreement and accepted by the insurance company, would constitute valid payment and relieve the reinsurer from any further payment obligation.

Taxation of insurance premiums
Peru has simplified the tax treatment of premiums payable to foreign insurance and reinsurance companies, making investments in Peru’s insurance industry even more beneficial. Peru’s income tax law establishes a ‘presumption of income’, where seven percent of the insurance premium value is deemed to come from a Peruvian source, taxable at 30 percent, which is applied only to the seven percent of presumed income.

Peru’s income tax law deems the Peruvian payor a withholding agent, and charges it with the obligation of withholding the Peruvian income tax – paying it to Peruvian National Tax Authority (SUNAT). If this tax treatment were not useful, under Peruvian law it is possible to negotiate a gross-up clause that would increase the premiums to include the payment of Peru’s income tax.

Legal expert: Victor Marroquín
Born in Lima, Marroquín attended the Naval Academy of Peru and the Pontificia Universidad Católica. He received his Juris Doctor degree from the University of Miami School of Law, where he was editor-in-chief of the International and Comparative Law Review, and his Master of Laws degree magna cum laude from Harvard Law School.

Marroquín was invited to join the legal department of the IMF in Washington DC, where he worked on various international projects involving legal and financial issues in Europe and Latin America. He then joined Baker & McKenzie as a member of its Latin America Practice Group. Living in Chicago he acted as project leader of the team representing the Peruvian government in the privatisation of the country’s airports, ports, railroads, and energy facilities. This included the granting of a master concession for Lima’s International Airport, the BOOT contract for Peru’s main electricity transmission line, and the master concessions for the Camisea Gas Field, one of the world’s largest deposits of natural gas.

Now a senior partner at Marroquín & Merino, his most recent transactions include advising Swiss Re in its reinsurance activities in Peru; representing Guidewire in negotiations with Peru’s Pacífico Seguros; advising Level 3 communications in the acquisition of Global Crossing’s Peruvian operations; the successful defence of PepsiCo Inc in litigation with a former bottler in Peru and New York; counselling Google in the establishment of its Peruvian subsidiary and operations; the acquisition of 56 mining concessions in northern Peru by Sezar Russia Investments; and the successful defence of Cisco Systems in litigation with Peru’s National Tax Authority (SUNAT). Marroquín’s practice involves M&A, finance, insurance, insolvency, taxation, and complex civil litigation.

Comments: 1
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.