Rising investment for Greek recovery

Solar energy could be hugely beneficial to Greece as the country attempts to revitalise its struggling economy

It is undeniable that current austerity measures are affecting entire professional sectors and traditional industries, which had previously developed successfully during economic growth. During the last few years, many people have been wondering what type of long-term plans are being developed to promote productivity and economic growth that are necessary for Greece to recover. One such area of potential growth is energy, a market that is attracting investors from around the globe, and may have positive chain effects for other market sectors, including construction.

Renewable energy sources play an important role in Greece’s energy production profile. One of the core components of Greece’s energy profile is solar energy. Worldwide, the total amount of investments in the area of renewable energy sources reached $211bn in 2010, and the total installed capacity in solar energy parks increased to 39.5GW in the same period, which represents an increase of 73 percent in relation to the previous year.

Greece has an advantageous sun radiation capacity, and it is estimated that one third of Greece’s energy requirements could be met with solar energy. Experts believe that the market will grow impressively and have a value of more than €4bn in just a few years.
Greece is encouraging the development of solar energy, and apart from the major global players in the energy sector, a number of small and mid-size companies have already invested in this sector. As a result, the installed capacity of renewable energy sources increased by 24 percent during 2002 and 2011. Solar energy covers approximately 22 percent of such installed capacity. Total sales of energy power from renewable energy sources reached €640m in 2011, from €148.8m in 2006. It is expected that electric power provided by renewable energy sources will keep increasing every year until 2020 by 15 percent.

The Greek government initiated project Helios, which includes the installation of 10GW solar energy, aiming to export solar energy in other European countries. Project Helios could attract new investments, create new employment opportunities, and give a boost to local businesses in the industry of solar energy. In the past four years, the sector has generated at least 4,250 full-time jobs. Greece’s natural and unexploited resource will be a key advantage for new industry growth.

Environmental regulations
Solar energy has a strong impact on the environment. It represents a decentralised energy source that results in lower energy losses for the system, lower grid infrastructure costs and a carbon dioxide free power generation. The European Union (EU) regulations outlining the auctioning of carbon emissions will drive up the cost of electricity that is produced from fossil fuels. The EU plans to gradually phase out free allowances and will auction off about 60 percent of all allotted CO2 permits in 2013. While this legislation may cause a spike in the cost of electricity, at the same time it can increase the viability and growth of the RES sector.

Investors are discovering the high potential that solar energy has in the Greek market. Beyond the positive environmental implications that PV systems present, there are currently some significant financial benefits for those interested in investing in a photovoltaic system.

The most significant is the Feed-In Tariff (FIT), which was enacted in Law 3468/2006. These tariffs guarantee a specific price at which PV-generated power will be purchased per megawatt (MWh), by the Public Power Corporation (PPC). Once FIT is granted, it is locked-in at that rate for a minimum of 20 years, with an annual adjustment to compensate for inflation that amounts to 25 percent of the previous year’s consumer price index. FIT’s for rooftop PV systems are being granted for 25 years. At current rates, a 10kWp rooftop system is priced between €35,000 and €40,000, which includes installation and generates an average revenue of €7,400 annually. At this rate, the system pays for itself in about five to seven years, depending on the financing and taxes involved. By the end of the 25 year period this investment has the potential to yield a profit of over €100,000 without any adjustment for inflation.

New regulatory framework
Greek licensing procedures for projects using renewable energy sources (RES) have been simplified. Indeed, Law 3894/2010 was passed by the Greek legislature specifically to remove roadblocks in the permitting procedure, and to fast-track large-scale strategic investments, including investments in renewable energy sources. The public agency Invest in Greece now operates as a system for investment planning procedures and oversees, coordinating all the necessary legal authorisations for project development. Under the fast-track procedures system in place, the project developers grant the agency the irrevocable authority to take all necessary steps in licensing procedure, and to apply and collect the necessary permits and licenses for projects. Greece’s new fast-track procedure ensures that all relevant permits and licenses for the investment are issued within two months after submitting an application to the appropriate agency.

In case the regular permitting procedure has been chosen, the first necessary permit is the Electricity Generation License (EGL). The Greek Regulatory Authority for Energy (RAE) grants the EGL after an evaluation process that assesses the investor’s technical and financial capability, and the project’s viability.

The Environmental Terms Approval (ETA) also needs to be obtained. Granting of the ETA depends on the level of the project’s environmental impact. Once the ETA is in place, an installation license is required. The project’s operator and the Greek Public Power Corporation S.A. (PPC) must agree on the terms and conditions for access to the grid, and must enter into a connection agreement. If the project will benefit from guaranteed FIT, the operator will have to enter into a Power Purchase Agreement. Once project construction is complete and the plant has undergone commissioning tests, an operation license is granted by the organisation that issued the Installation License.

In the past, the full authorisation procedure needed on average more than three and a half years to complete, even for small solar power plants and wind farms. It has reached seven years for larger projects. With the new streamlined approval process however, there is a coordination of all activities among the different administrative bodies.

The RES Law 3851/2010 has set mandatory deadlines, establishing a firm timeframe, within which authorisation should be completed. The whole licensing procedure must not exceed more than one year. Whether this accelerated processing will be achieved is yet to be seen.

Smaller scale projects, including the PV power stations with capacities up to 1MWp, are, to a certain extent, exempt from the licensing procedure. In order to provide assistance at the beginning of the investment, tax law provides a suspension period for VAT payments until the investment begins to generate profits. This way cash flow for investment purposes becomes easier.

Risk-free investment?
Although the legal, financial and regulatory framework actually works, and many global and local companies invested in solar energy and renewable sources, there are still many issues to be resolved. One factor that has led to such a large number of proposals being submitted is that licenses for solar systems can be sold to another purchaser once granted by the RAE. The idea is that a property owner, who does not have the financial means to invest in a solar park, can obtain a license, sell it and also lease the accompanying land to the purchaser, leading numerous property owners to pay experts to submit the appropriate paperwork on their behalf.

This has created problems where licenses have been granted to individuals who do not have the investment capital to build the PV installation, resulting in the exclusion of investors who have the capital, or forcing them to purchase a license. In a specific prefecture there may be a limitation on absorption capacity, so unused issued licenses may be blocking out real investors.

However, those who want to invest in the Greek PV market and do not want to deal with Greek bureaucracy are able to walk into the market, for a price. Measures have been taken to require many of the previously proposed projects be implemented by 2013, after which they will become void, allowing room for new applications. This space between the licensee and the investor is increasing the investment cost.

Other main concerns of the private sector are related to the business environment, which includes: an uncertain tax environment; the possible change of FIT due to unstable financial situation in the country; constantly changing regulatory framework and late payments for the finance provided. Despite remaining difficulties, the solar energy market in Greece could definitely prove to be one of the most profitable investments in the renewable energy sources market currently available now, and for the future.

For further information: www.ptlegal.eu; email: info@ptlegal.eu

Comments: 0
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.