Spanish real estate – what happened after the bubble burst?

Spanish companies in the struggling real estate sector are trying to escape the shackles of their domestic country

Actividades de Construction y Servicios (ACS), which had  the defunct financial institution Bankia as one of its major investors, is rumoured to be looking for a buyer for its own headquarters. It has already pledged €900m worth of shares in German builder Hotchief, which it took over last year, as collateral for an earlier loan in July.

In another recent deal in South America, it sold off its Brazilian high-voltage electricity transmission assets to the value of 1,86 bn reals ($938.2m), to China’s State Grid Corporation. Yet ACS is still one of the worst-performing companies in Madrid’s blue-chip IBEX. Its stock lost 43 percent of value this year.

Another of Spain’s biggest construction companies, FCC, has made the decision to expand. It is building its new headquarters in the City of London, after its UK turnover increased by 15.5 percent in Q1 of 2012. It is also part of a consortium bidding for the £600m Mersey gateway scheme. Recent projects include: the 2012 Media Centre that it is just finishing work on, and the two Crossrail sections whose contract it acquired via its subsidiary, Alpine BeMo Tunnelling.

FCC’s results for the first quarter of 2012 show that more than half its total revenues of €2billion came from outside Spain. The European country where it has the largest stake is Austria, through Alpine, the country’s second largest construction group, (which accounts for 41.4 percent of its international sales). The next largest is Germany, with 18.9 percent. FCC probably emerged in a stronger position, because it was not linked to Spain’s fourth-largest bank Bankia. Bankia was bailed out by the government for €19bn late in May.

One of the reforms outgoing President Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero insisted on in return were a number of “soft mergers” between Bankia and its local regional branches, or ‘caja’. The Caja Madrid was one of the major culprits in the over-lending to mortgage customers which created the real estate crisis. In 2006, after its mortgage book expanded by 25 percent, the Caja Madrid’s own head of capital markets is quoted as saying, “We don’t want to grow that fast. We are a savings bank.”

Caja Madrid received a refinancing loan from the Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria (FROB) for €4.600m earlier this year. Its former director general Rodrigo Rato was then replaced by Sanchez Barcoj. The government has undergone some criticism for the comfortable pensions many of the former caja heads have been retired with – one of the accusations which provoked the general strike in March and the ‘May Day’ protests.

Thousands of protestors signed a petition against banks’ continuing ability to repossess the homes of defaulting mortgage customers, and then to sell them without cancelling their debt. Recent reforms have enforced a ceiling on interest rates for mortgage repayments, for those homeowners struggling to meet them. Yet conversely, the government and Bank of Spain have actively promoted the use of online property auctions to sell repossessed houses.

It remains a difficult balancing act for the Spanish government. Initially its reaction to the mortgage crisis, and general economic restructuring in 2008, seemed a modest success: the budget deficit reduced from 11.1 percent in 2009, to 9.3 percent in 2010. Yet its economy shrank 0.4 percent in the first quarter of 2012, and Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy seems unlikely to want to reduce banks’ ability to demand collateral for their loans.

One thing is certain. The number of Spanish real estate developers available for those looking to invest in property on the Costa del Sol is in decline. Metrovacesa and Colonial, two major, over-geared, developers forced into bank control by the crisis, saw falls in their stock this year by 43.3 percent and 66.84 percent respectively. A third, Martinsa-Fadesa, went into administration.

A smaller company Astroc was bought out by its rival Afirma after it lost 70 percent of its share value in a week, and was able to take advantage of a restructural plan which granted it €1.5bn in short and long-term lending. Because it postponed its first amortisation until the end of 2010, it paid just 10 percent of its debt in 2011. However, 20 percent is due in 2012 and it remains to be seen whether the developer can meet the 55 percent of its obligations due in 2013.

It is unlikely that Spanish homeowners are in the same state as the US sub-prime market, where the total that homeowners owe on mortgage repayments outweighs the total value of their houses. Yet the Spanish government is probably right to be cautious before allowing an unrestricted timetable of repayments for defaulters, whether a listed company or the owner of a semi-detached villa. Limitless cheap credit has not yet solved the eurozone crisis.

Comments: 2
Join the discussion below
  • worldfinance

    Informative.

    • worldfinance

      I would agree. It’s good.

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.