Santander to buy SEB’s German retail banking unit

Spain’s largest bank Santander moved one step closer to its goal to be a full service retail bank in Germany with the acquisition of Sweden’s SEB retail banking division, the bank has announced.

The Ä555m ($699.1m) deal comes as Santander attempts to increase its footprint in both Europe, particularly Germany and Britain, as well as in higher growth markets like Latin America, where it is reported to be planning acquisitions in Columbia and Peru.

“Germany is a core market for Santander. This acquisition is a significant step toward achieving our goal of being a full service retail bank in Europe,” Chairman Emilio Botin said in the bank’s press release.

The purchase price is close to the Ä500m sources familiar with the matter told reporters Santander would pay for the division, which made an operating loss of Ä117m in 2009. Santander said its core capital ratio could fall by ten basis points from the acquisition.

Earlier the Financial Times cited Francisco Luzon, head of Santander’s Latin American operations, as saying that the bank was looking to increase its presence in Colombia and Peru, where it has market shares of between 10 and 20 percent.

ECB’s Trichet: budget cuts won’t lead to new slump

ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet dismissed warnings that drastic and simultaneous spending cuts planned by eurozone governments could send the 16-country bloc back into recession.

US policymakers have called for continued stimulus to keep momentum in the global recovery, while many economists and academics have raised fears that austerity measures on the cards in Athens and a clutch of other European capitals could snuff out the eurozone’s nascent recovery.

“We are totally against the view that reducing public expenditures will hinder economic growth,” Trichet said at an ECB watchers conference organised by the Goethe University Frankfurt’s Centre for Financial Studies.

“Consolidation measures will help turn the current upturn into sustained growth.”

The ECB took a cautiously confident view of the eurozone’s recovery after it held the bloc’s interest rates at a record low one percent.

Trichet said it was too soon to sound the all-clear over the crisis, but backed eagerly awaited bank stress tests – currently being carried out on a sizeable chunk of Europe’s financial sector – to help the recovery process.

“These tests will increase transparency and enhance investors’ confidence in Europe’s banking sector,” he said.

It remains vital for governments to get their finances back in order, he said.

“Just like consumers and countries, governments cannot live beyond their means forever. Fiscal authorities need to look beyond the current cyclical upturn. There is no alternative to that.”

In a copy of Trichet’s speech released by the ECB, he also backed harsh punishments for governments that flout Europe’s deficit limits.

“In the most severe cases of persistent non-compliance (countries not complying with stability pact rules), a limitation or suspension of voting rights should be considered.

“We are now at a stage in which we have to finalise new rules and regulations that will help to make our economies more resilient… It is a very important phase and it requires our full attention,” he added.

Precautionary principles

In order to protect the environment the Precautionary Approach is widely applied: fundamentally, where there are potentially grave or irreversible threats, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective action.

The main difference is in how precaution should be exercised in practice. This basis for precautionary principle in many conventions and treaties requires differentiating them from those that are legally binding and those that are not. An early example of legal precaution is Justinian’s statement, in 527AD, that “the maxims of the law are to live honestly, to cause no harm unto others, and to give everyone his due”. Today, the forms of the precautionary principle generally require ranking of choices based on either a full risk-cost-benefit balancing or some accounting for the costs or risks, or both, but one should also consider, depending on the jurisdiction, factors that go beyond the confines of cost–benefit analysis. Legal principles are generally unenforceable as such, although modern legislation accords them a positive and guiding force; preambles and principles are statements of general legal intent and thus lack the specificity required for enforcement. On the other hand, certain enunciations of the precautionary principle are a constitutional command, as in the EU.

Precautionary principles should be differentiated from other principles of precaution, such as zero or significant risk because the former are part of statutory law, while precautionary principles are often constitutional. All however reflect varying levels of public policy, often resulting in secondary legislation that can err on the side of uniformity and ease of use by adopting conjectural defaults. Precautionary principles formulate a moral justification for acting when a hazard can potentially cause severe consequences and its causation is uncertain. This moral justification can result in a suboptimal choice: consequences that are more adverse have been known to occur after implementation of a precautionary choice.Yet the concern is that anticipatory actions and erring on the side of caution are necessary in choices that affect occupational or public hazards. In some of those principles, the magnitude or the severity of the potential consequences leads to disregarding their probabilities and the uncertainty in the causal connection between them and the hazard. Bans characterise these choices. Others believe in the proposition that precautionary decisions and choices must be guided by balancing risks, costs, and benefits, as well as being characterised by a specific level of legally demonstrable causation.

The repeated lesson, still only partially included in much political discussion, is that precautionary choices thought to prevent hazards when they are implemented, are later found to cause unanticipated harm. If that unanticipated harm could have been predicted, the failure to have done so is inexcusable in the sense that acting on a conjectured danger, justified by a legal maxim, is unfair – because it redirects scarce resources from more valuable societal investments.

Yet, not acting by postponing preventive action, because of large uncertainties surrounding the severity of the hazard, can increase the magnitude of those consequences. Thus the dilemma, should society wait until uncertainties are sufficiently resolved to trigger regulatory action, or act precipitously on a conjecture? The corollary question is; What is sufficient evidence?

There is a simple rule that is specific to uncertain hazards: the assessment and selection of the preferred choice from the set of choices is based on scientific analyses of these choices, given the full – and thus avoiding simplifying assumptions or practical shortcuts – state of knowledge about the hazard. Each choice, consequence, probability of occurring, and so on is assessed through risk-cost-benefit balancing; the idea is to inform and guide decision makers and stakeholders, not command them to commit to a specific action. The justification of the final choice in the public interest, a matter of public policy, must account for factors that cannot be directly included in the risk-cost-benefit balancing. In the EU, for example, having to account for the economic and social development of the community as a whole, as per Art. 134r(3) of the Treaty of Maastricht can require analyses that extend beyond the confines of a choice-specific balancing. The risk-cost-benefit analyses are essential because they account for uncertainty, causation, the value of new information and the cost of gathering it, and the utility of the payoffs associated with each option open to the decision maker. In terms of how to analyse those actions, balancing criteria such as the maximisation of the expected discounted values of the payoffs, can guide the selection of the optimal (relative to the criterion adopted) act by identifying it. Those analyses are transparent, replicable, and testable via a number of methods, including simulations. Their extent can go beyond microeconomic consideration to include macroeconomic ones. There are costs of either action or inaction to society; nonetheless, the magnitude of the stakes justifies formal analysis of risky choices. However, conducting formal analyses is also costly. These costs include having to deal with: complex mathematical and statistical issues, data needs and their availability, and several forms of uncertainty and variability. In the end, the results from formal analysis are constructive and meant to inform policy-makers. Although the analyses are formal and thus independently replicable, those analyses are not normative.

Assessing and implementing actions to limit exposure to the hazardous situation and thus reduce risk and monitoring risky choices under a precautionary principle are the explicit results of legislative fiat that are costly to society. That is, it is possible that the improperly justified allocation under a precautionary principle would divert some scarce resources to pay for an action that is much less protective than its next best alternative, as measured by the opportunity cost of the action not taken.

When the magnitude of the consequences and the probabilities are both large, quick action becomes imperative.

Precautionary principles argue for both circumspection and prevention when the magnitude of the potential adverse event is severe, but its probability is relatively small. Arguing for costly action when the causes of the adverse event are either poorly understood or conjectural is unlikely to result in an equitable distribution of risks and benefits, if an action developed on such basis is taken. When the expected loss of a choice is small, some can argue against taking immediate precautionary action if the magnitude of the expected value is smaller than some legal minimum. Others look at the magnitude and severity of the probable outcome, but keep probability and magnitude separate and do not multiply them, thus arguing for action even when the probability is small but the magnitude of the adverse consequences is large. These alternative situations reinforce the suggestions that, regardless of their wording, the enunciation of the precautionary principle should contain specific guidance on the strength of the scientific evidence and the explicit recognition of time-dependent changes in scientific information.

This article is an edited version of
an entry in the “Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and
Assessment”, Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Used by
permission.

www.wiley.com

Hendrisman Rahim on Indonesia | Asuransi Jiwasraya

With just 14 percent of Indonesia’s population insured, the challenge for the sector is showing people the benefits that comprehensive financial planning can bring to themselves and their families. Hendrisman Rahim discusses Asuransi Jiwasraya’s 150 years of experience, its comprehensive distribution networks, and the new products the company has tailored to meet the needs of a new generation.

Japan machinery orders slide on economy doubts

Japanese machinery orders tumbled by the most in almost two years in May as companies grew more cautious about the business outlook due to a rising yen and signs of a global economic slowdown.

Bank lending in June also fell, matching the biggest annual decline in almost five years, as demand from companies for funds to invest in plants and equipment remained sluggish.

Bank of Japan Governor Masaaki Shirakawa stuck to the central bank’s view that Japan’s economy was showing further signs of a moderate recovery, but he and other market watchers voiced concerns about the potential fallout from Europe’s debt woes.

A senior government official said there was a risk Japan’s economy may enter a lull, after service sector sentiment worsened for two straight months in June.

“Europe’s financial problems haven’t had an impact yet, but companies are applying the brakes now,” said Tetsuro Sawano, a senior fixed-income strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities in Tokyo.

“People are also worried about a slowdown in the United States later this year.”

Core private-sector machinery orders, a highly volatile series regarded as an indicator of capital spending, fell 9.1 percent in May, the biggest decline since August 2008 and far more than the median market forecast for a 3.1 percent decline.

Germany drafts Ä9bn defence savings plan

German defence ministry experts have drawn up a list of potential
savings in weapons and equipment worth Ä9.3bn in the long-term,
according to newspaper reports.

German daily Bild reported the
number of A400M military transport aircraft would be reduced and 15
Transall transport planes taken out of service immediately.

Under the proposal, Germany would buy only 80 NH-90 helicopters instead
of the planned 122 and halve the number of new Tiger attack helicopters
to 40.

Bild and business daily Handelsblatt reported the plan
included buying 37 fewer Eurofighter combat jets than originally
planned.

Handelsblatt said the 23-page document recommended
placing no orders for EADS’s Talarion UAV and instead ordering Saateg AA
Male drones, in what would be a further blow for the French-German
company.

Bild said the plan recommended Defence Minister
Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg reduce the number of Tornados in the air
force to 85 from 185 as quickly as possible, the newspaper said.

The German navy should take eight frigates, 10 speedboats and 21 Sea
King helicopters out of service in the medium to longer-term and order
only three instead of four new class 125 frigates, Bild reported the
savings plan as saying.

The US-European MEADS missile
development programme would not be affected, the paper said.

Spyker avoids more debt in final Saab payment

Dutch carmaker Spyker Cars used internal funding rather than external
debt to pay General Motors the final $24m purchase price for Sweden’s
Saab, ending concern over how it would foot the bill.

Niche
carmaker Spyker, which has never made a profit, took over the larger
Saab from GM earlier this year and is now working to revive the flagging
brand, but the final instalment of the purchase price had been due on
July 15.

Spyker Cars said it made the payment without increasing
its external debt or issuing new shares, adding the internal funding
became available after the acquisition of Saab Great Britain Limited by
Spyker on May 31.

A Spyker Cars spokesman said the company paid
the final instalment to GM using cash from Saab Great Britain.

“Saab
Great Britain is a wholly own subsidiary of Spyker Cars and has given
an inter company loan to Spyker,” spokesman Mike Stainton said.

Further concern had been sparked about the company’s ability to fund the
final part of the deal after it said in February it still needed to
secure financing for the $24m payment.

Spyker Cars had said it
intended to fund the payment primarily through senior debt and that it
had pledged assets to GM as security for the final payment.

“The
early payment of the second and last instalment underlines our desire
to finalise the transaction with GM as soon as it was possible, enabling
management to fully focus on the future of the group,” Spyker Cars
Chief Executive Victor Muller said in a statement.

Spyker spent
$400m buying the iconic Swedish brand Saab, $74m of which was paid in
cash for Saab, including $25m borrowed from a Muller investment vehicle
and $25m from an issue of shares, largely to GEM Global Yield Fund Ltd.

Japan business mood best in two years

Japanese business confidence was at its best in two years in the three months to June and big firms revised up capital spending plans, a Bank of Japan survey showed, in a sign the export-driven economic recovery is taking hold.

The tankan survey showed Europe’s sovereign debt woes and the sharp appreciation in the yen that followed have not yet taken a toll as Japanese companies benefit from solid exports to Asia, to the relief of policymakers.

But analysts say sentiment may sour as world stock prices extend losses on fresh sovereign debt stress in Europe and growing fears of another global economic downturn.

“Overall, the tankan survey shows better corporate sentiment, especially among big manufacturers, who have raised their outlook, but it still leaves some elements of concern. The survey does not paint an entirely optimistic view for the economy,” said Ayako Sera, market strategist at Sumitomo Trust and Banking in Tokyo.

“Companies’ exchange rate forecasts show they still expect the yen to stay under strengthening pressure, which will hurt their earnings.”

The headline index measuring big manufacturers’ sentiment improved 15 points to plus 1 in June, the tankan quarterly survey shows, higher than a median market forecast of minus four. It was the fifth consecutive quarter of improvement and the first time sentiment turned optimistic in two years.

The index for September was seen at plus three, showing firms expect conditions to improve further over the next three months.

In a sign the recovery is broadening, the survey showed big firms expect to increase capital spending by 4.4 percent for the year that started in April.

While that was smaller than the 4.9 percent rise forecast by economists, it was an improvement over the previous tankan that showed companies planned to cut spending by 0.4 percent. In the previous year, big firms cut capital spending by 17 percent.

Benefits moderating
Japan’s benchmark 10-year yield gained two basis points to 1.1 percent after the tankan, pulling away from a seven-year low hit on June 30. But the optimism shown in the survey was not enough to keep the Nikkei average from hitting a seven-month low.

Japan’s first-quarter economic growth outpaced that of the US and Europe on solid exports to Asia. The rebound in exports has led to a bottoming out in capital spending.

But falling shipments and rising inventory in May signalled the benefits of a rebound in exports may be moderating. Analysts say growth will likely slow this year as the impact of subsidies on energy-efficient goods fades.

Recent yen gains may also dampen sentiment. Big manufacturers forecast the dollar on average to stand at 90.18 yen in the current fiscal year, the June tankan showed, against 91.00 yen predicted three months ago. The yen has already moved higher than the June forecast and is hovering around 88 yen to the dollar.

“Uncertainty over the outlook, stock falls, the yen’s further gains as well as a rise in real interest rates due to deflation may hit corporate capital spending ahead,” said Junko Nishioka, chief Japan economist at RBS Securities.

“Excess employment and production capacity continued to ease but the situation has not improved enough to resolve output gap, so deflation remains a drag on the economy.”

The tankan’s index measuring job conditions showed companies see excess labour shrinking only modestly, a sign they will not boost hiring any time soon.

That adds to challenges for Prime Minister Naoto Kan, seeking to appeal to voters before a July 11 upper house election with pledges that his Democratic Party can strengthen the economy and repair the country’s tattered finances with tax hikes.

The tankan will also be scrutinised when BOJ board members next meet for a rate review on July 14-15. The central bank is expected to keep interest rates near zero. It will also review its long-term growth forecasts issued in April, under which it expects the economy to recover on solid Asian growth.

“The BOJ must be relieved to see this tankan, because it confirms that the economic outlook report issued in April is still valid,” said Naomi Hasegawa, a senior fixed-income strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities in Tokyo.

“The BOJ is likely to keep monetary policy unchanged. At the same time, the BOJ will mention increasing uncertainties due to fiscal concerns in Europe.”

The sentiment indexes are derived by subtracting the percentage of respondents who say conditions are poor from those who say they are good. Negative readings mean pessimists outnumber optimists.

Correlated risks

Correlated risk refers to the simultaneous occurrence of many losses
from a single event. Natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and
hurricanes produce highly correlated losses: many homes in the affected
area are damaged and destroyed by a single event. An insurer will face
this problem if it has many eggs in one basket, such as providing
earthquake coverage mainly to homes in Los Angeles rather than
diversifying across the entire state of California.

To
illustrate the impact of correlated risks on the distribution of losses,
assume that there are two policies sold against a risk where p = 0.1, L
= $100, where p is the probability of a loss and L is the magnitude of
the loss. The actuarial loss for each policy is $10. If the losses are
perfectly correlated, then there will be either two losses with
probability of 0.1, or no losses with a probability of 0.9. On the other
hand, if the losses are independent of each other, then the chance of
two losses decreases to 0.01 (ie, 0.1 × 0.1), with the probability of no
losses being 0.81 (ie, 0.9 × 0.9). There is also a 0.18 chance that
there will be only one loss (ie, 0.9 × 0.1 + 0.1 × 0.9).

The
expected loss for both the correlated and uncorrelated risks is $20.
However, the variance is always higher for correlated than for
uncorrelated risks if each has the same expected loss. If a risk-averse
insurer faces a highly correlated loss from one event, it will want to
set a high enough premium to not only to cover its expected losses but
also to protect itself against the higher probability of experiencing
catastrophic losses due to the higher variance. Thus, risk-averse
insurers will always want to charge a higher premium for correlated
risks than uncorrelated risks.

This article is an edited version of
an entry in the “Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and
Assessment”, Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Used by
permission.

www.wiley.com

StanChart stumps up $500m for AgBank IPO

Asia-focused bank Standard Chartered Plc said it will invest $500m as a cornerstone investor in Agricultural Bank of China’s IPO in Hong Kong.

AgBank is seeking to raise more than $20bn in a Hong Kong and Shanghai IPO, and sources had previously told reporters that Standard Chartered would invest $500m.

The listing is expected to value AgBank at about $150bn. Standard Chartered will be buying just over two percent of the shares on offer in the IPO and will get a stake of about 0.3 percent in the enlarged bank.

The two banks have signed an agreement to develop new business opportunities together.

“For Standard Chartered, this deal has a lot of potential. However, the payback could be well into the future and more near term concerns over (the) Chinese economy slowing may weigh on Standard Chartered’s share price in the meantime,” said Bruce Packard, analyst at Seymour Pierce in London.

The bank, which is based in London but derives over four-fifths of its profits from Asia, aims to take advantage of AgBank’s extensive domestic network, in return providing its partner with access to its international footprint.

This could include access to capital markets, international trade corridors, financial markets and consumer finance sectors, and share information, research and staff training, Standard Chartered said.

AgBank is the last of China’s big four banks to list its shares and the first to do so without first bringing in a major foreign strategic investor. The commercial bank, started in 1951, has over 23,000 branches and about 2.6 million corporate customers and 320 million retail customers.

Standard Chartered said it will pay for the stake from its internal cash resources, which is likely to shave about 10 basis points off its Core Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.9 percent at the end of 2009, analysts estimated.

Stocks fall as bank funding worries intensify

World stocks hit a 2-1/2 week low on Tuesday while oil and the euro also
slipped as investors grew nervous over the funding situation of banks
about to repay 442 billion euros ($545.5 billion) to the European
Central Bank.

Banks must repay the money borrowed a year ago at
rock bottom rates on Thursday, leaving a potential liquidity shortfall
in the financial system of over 100 billion euros.

The ECB holds
a three-month tender on Wednesday which many in the market expect will
be tapped as banks scramble to pay back the one-year funds. Expectations
are that 210 billion euros will be allotted at the offer.

“There’s
concern over the ECB expiry of the massive liquidity facilities member
state banks have been enjoying … We’re seeing a real sense of
uncertainty about the market at the moment, a real lack of conviction,”
IG Markets analyst Ben Potter noted.

“When we have that there’s a
natural tendency for the market to drift lower, which is what we’re
seeing.”

The state of banks will become clearer when the details
of bank stress tests are published next month.

Sources told
Reuters on Monday more than 100 banks in Europe will be examined in a
second round of stress tests to gauge how they can handle shocks to the
financial system. MSCI world equity index fell 1 percent while the
FTSEurofirst 300 index lost 1.6 percent.

Emerging stocks dropped
by 1.8 percent.

Chinese stocks fell 4 percent to a 14-month low
as investors started pulling funds from the market to prepare for a
major initial public offering by Agricultural Bank of China, pointing to
tight liquidity in China’s markets.

Euro suffers
The euro fell 0.4
percent to $1.2224 while it fell to record lows of 1.3250 against the
safe-haven Swiss francs.

The euro lost 1.3 percent to 108.25
yen, just shy of eight-year lows around 108.05 set earlier this month.

“Investors
are nervous, shifting their attention back to Europe because a massive
amount of money will move there,” said Hideki Hayashi, global economist
at Mizuho Securities in Tokyo.

“The euro could revisit its
eight-year low against the yen.”

The dollar rose 0.4 percent
against a basket of major currencies.

 U.S. crude oil fell 2.2
percent after forecasts indicated tropical storm Alex would skirt the
main production region in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, limiting disruptions
to a few precautionary shutdowns.