Parpública: Portugal’s airport network attracts investment

The privatisation of Aeroportos de Portugal, (ANA) was one among many of the demanding and challenging commitments undertaken within the Financial and Economic Assistance Programme signed between the European Commission (EC), the ECB, the IMF, and the Portuguese government.

ANA, together with Aeroportos e Navegação Aérea da Madeira (ANAM) manages 10 airports across Portugal – Lisbon, Porto, Faro, Beja – four airports in Azores and two airports in Madeira – that account for almost the entirety of the commercial air traffic in the country. Portugal’s airport operator was sold to Vinci Group for €3.08bn. This represents over 15 times the company’s €199.8m earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) in 2011. According to airline-industry data, the average multiple of recent deals in the sector is eight times 2011 EBITDA.

However, the importance of this transaction derives not only from the amount of cash paid by Vinci Group to the Portuguese state, but more importantly, from its role as part of the Portuguese government’s strategy to improve the competitiveness and robustness of the Portuguese economy, which aims at strengthening the development of the Portuguese airport network and encouraging the involvement of the private sector in productive investments.

This achievement constitutes good evidence that, even in times of crisis, Portugal remains appealing to business investments and is capable of attracting foreign investors (see Fig. 1). It is absolutely remarkable that, in less than six months, the Portuguese government, together with its advisors, was able to launch and conclude this privatisation process with such an outcome, in an extremely competitive environment and in full compliance with strict transparency and competition rules.

New regulatory model
Together with the privatisation process and before its conclusion, the government approved a new legal framework and the economic regulation applicable to the airport concession, and signed a concession agreement with ANA for a 50-year period.

There is no doubt that the clear economic regulation established created requisite conditions in the absence of which the successful outcome of the privatisation would not have been possible. In fact, such regulation aligned the public interest with the shareholders’ expectations and established a rational approach to increasing capacity, when and if required.

Moreover, a governance model was also set out in the concession agreement, aiming to balance the relationship between the grantor and the concessionaire, allowing the country’s representatives to reflect the national interest and to influence the management of the airports network, namely through the approval of a strategic plan for each five-year period.

The incentive for the passengers’ growth in the new economic regulation process and in the concession agreement, is for the clear indication to develop additional capacity in the Lisbon region, and the integrated management of the network assets to assure a proper return on the overall employed capital, supporting the process of adding value that has contributed to the positive final outcome.

Privatisation process
The privatisation process was organised to fully ensure the participation of the widest number of adequate bidders, and particularly those with strategic ownership interests. As such, the bidding process ensured a competitive and transparent process, while, at the same time, preserved the value of the assets and their economic importance.

Portugal's-economic-forecast

The process included two separate phases, aimed at achieving the goals outlined above. Phase one – which took more than six weeks – began with extensive market consultations, which involved a wide range of potential strategic investors. The initial consultation process identified 54 entities potentially interested in the privatisation, with 33 entities gaining access to the relevant documentation in order for submitting a non-binding offer. In all, eight non-binding offers were received, three from single entities and five from consortia.

Five interested parties were then selected to participate in phase two, by submitting binding offers within a time frame of four weeks. In this second phase, the interested parties were given access to more detailed information and were able to have individual meetings with the government advisors and the company management. Potential bidders were also allowed to visit the airport infrastructures. At the end of phase two, four binding offers were submitted, one from a single entity, and three from consortia. The fifth potential bidder withdrew its offer.

Selection of the winning bidder
The choice of the winning bidder was based on selection criteria set out in the Terms of Reference, which included (without limitation) the maximisation of the revenue arising from the privatisation. It also included the quality of the strategic plan for the company, aiming to reinforce the growth potential and efficiency of ANA and therefore, increasing its competitive position and the long-term value of the airports. The final point included in the Terms of Reference is the minimisation of the Portuguese state’s exposure to risks related to the implementation of the privatisation procedure, notably by ensuring that its framework fully protects the national interest and maximises revenues.

ANA then assessed the four binding bids on its suitability, particularly in relation to its technical and strategic components, with a view to achieving compatibility with the company’s strategic interests and future development. Parpública, the state’s holding company which owned ANA, drew up a reasoned report assessing each of the four bidders, taking into account the aforementioned assessment from ANA.

Parpública and ANAs reports were sent to a special monitoring committee set up to oversee the privatisation process. The committee then issued a reasoned opinion on the regularity, impartiality and transparency of the process, and concluded on its appropriateness.

After analysing the referred two reports and the reasoned opinion issued by the special committee, the Portuguese government chose Vinci as the winning bidder. The final price of €3.08bn offered by Vinci was higher than the pre-sale estimate given by the independent consultant and 26 percent higher than the offer of the second highest bid. The highest bidder also offered the best strategic project.

[E]ven in times of crisis, Portugal remains appealing to business investments and is capable of attracting foreign investors

Indeed, the superior quality of the strategic plan submitted by Vinci, currently documented in The Framework Agreement signed between the parties, will allow ANA to expand its activities and to develop the airports of Lisbon, Porto, Faro, Madeira and Azores, and will therefore contribute to the development of each of the regions served by those infrastructures. The Framework Agreement also ensures the endurance of ANAs corporate identity and the preservation of the value of its assets, including the Portuguese Hub, as a key link between Europe, South America and Africa.

Moreover, the integration of ANA in the Vinci Group will not only promote job creation but also constitutes a major opportunity for projecting Portuguese know-how and capabilities of ANAs technicians, internationally recognised by all stakeholders in this market. For Vinci Group, this transaction was also a milestone, since ANA became the major airport manager of its portfolio, permitting Vinci to gain critical mass in this sector to foster its activities as a world reference player.

Creating solid aviation management
Recognising the openness and transparency of the privatisation process, the EC has given the green light to ANAs sale to Vinci. This is referenced in the ECs statement, where “The Commission concluded that the negotiation process used by Portugal was open and transparent, and the eligibility criteria in effect were not discriminatory as regards clauses on company operational scale and track record in airport management,” before stating that the “proposal accepted from Vinci was the best proposal received and clearly exceeded the evaluation of the assets made by an independent entity prior to the sale.

It should also be noted that all documents relating to this process were submitted by the government both to the special monitoring committee and to the Portuguese Court of Auditors, in order to allow those entities to validate the regularity, impartiality and transparency of the process.

Therefore, it is the Portuguese government’s strong belief that the privatisation of ANA, together with the new regulatory framework and the concession agreement in place, will boost ANAs economic growth and increase its efficiency and competitive position in the European and global aviation market, for the benefit of the civil aviation sector, tourism, the users of the national airport infrastructures and the Portuguese economy as a whole.

Portuguese privatisation programme
It is worth mentioning that ANAs transaction was not the only well succeeded deal undertaken by the Portuguese government during the Assistance Programme. Actually, so far the government has completed seven privatisations in utilities, health, airport operations and postal services, amounting to more than €8bn.

It has undertaken the sale of 21.35 percent plus 4.14 percent stakes in EDP (a leading Portuguese power company), 40 percent in REN (the gas and electric grid operator), one percent in GALP (a leading Portuguese oil and natural gas integrated operator), 100 percent of CGD Saúde (a leading private health player in Portugal), 100 percent of ANA, 70 percent in CTT (a leading Portuguese postal services provider), and 85 percent in Caixa Seguros (a leading Portuguese insurance company).

The particular benign conditions in which all these transactions took place, regarding favourable pre-requisites and specific regulations, permitted the price to be maximised in all cases. The diversification of strategic investors set forth the interest and confidence in the Portuguese companies and in the Portuguese economy.

Other transactions are being prepared by the government in order to continue to foster the competitiveness, transparency and growth of the economy. The openness of the Portuguese economy is a proof of its strength in the global markets and of the competitiveness of its companies.

Social media key for brokerage firms, say Tradenet execs

Brokerage firms want to increase trades, but they don’t want to be hard influencers for customers to do so. Technology can play a role to subliminally stimulate trades and encourage a customer to be an active trader while keeping the brokerage firms far from blame. However, brokerage firms need to think beyond the traditional way of doing business, and to modernise their trading platform to do so. Brokerage firms should provide their customers with intelligent solutions to help them trade easier, in a more convenient and efficient manner.

Customer behaviour can be influenced by a number of means without necessarily incurring huge costs. Rather, it can be achieved by just doing things a little differently. Brokerage firms need to capitalise on the request moments.

Trading platforms need to combine financial trading and the best features of social networks and make them available to their users in a fast and easy way

When a customer requests something, information or transaction, it is the instance that she or he is in the “receiving mode”. This is the instance that brokerage firms need to capitalise on to stimulate trades. The information is usually already with the firm. It is only a matter of shaping and presenting it.

For example, when a customer requests the performance chart of a stock, the brokerage firm can, instead of just putting forward the request chart alone, put the requested chart in addition to two more charts for two other stocks that share something with the one requested by the customer. They could be from the same or complementing industry, have the same risk profile or future outlook, or produce the same fundamental ratios on their business.

Additionally, the brokerage firm can display statistics relating to customer behaviour with regards to this stock during the day. Specifically, the number of customers who viewed this stock, or the number of customers who bought it, the number of customers who sold it, and the number of stocks traded by the firm in the day.

Such information gives the customer a sense of relativity. The customer will think, “oh, I am doing what everyone else is doing. I am safe”, or, depending on the customer’s investment attitude, “oh, I am doing what everyone else is doing. There is no money in it”. However, regardless of the sentiment of the customer, behavioural statistics are likely to stimulate trades.

Deciphering the competition
Comparative information is also intriguing for real time customers. “How am I doing compared to others?” is an eternal question in everyone’s mind, all the time. Brokerage firms have plenty of information that can be used to show each customer how they are doing comparatively, without disclosing confidential information.

For example, letting the customer know the percentile they are in with respect to today’s profitability, where do they stand with respect to stock concentration per industry, or how they did this month versus last month in terms of their ranking.

Comparative information is useful not only to know if someone is doing well or not, but also to know if they are with the main trade or not. Investors vary in their appetite and it is important for some to know if they are with the main stream or taking their own path. Changing the media for providing information can contribute to higher chances of receiving information and, therefore, increased trades. People prefer watching to reading.

The trading platform should also allow users to share trading ideas and opportunities socially

Instead of providing research reports to customer mail or email boxes, which usually get skipped, deliver the research in video to their mobiles and laptops. It is the same research. Just have someone read it. Technology is already available to convert text to voice, which is a step that costs little.

Social networks are becoming an integral part in our daily life these days. Trading platforms need to combine financial trading and the best features of social networks and make them available to their users in a fast and easy way. Expressing one’s self is the main human desire driving the prosperity of social media. It is the same in trading. People want to express themselves.

This could mean enabling customers to share wins and losses with a pre-defined group, or those following them on Twitter. It also means enabling customers to state their opinion on a stock from within the system to their chat rooms, Facebook friends or Twitter followers. The key is to provide this ability from within the trading platform itself in order to make the experience seamless.

A smarter trading platform must reshape inter-activity with customers by making it more personal and relevant to them. It should leverage the power of modern technology to drive customer engagement and motivate changes in their trading behaviour. To achieve the required effect, trading platforms should encourage peer pressure and competition for more active trading behaviour.

To further engage customers, the trading platforms should provide a facility to reward best-performing traders for their good performance and allow other users to mimic their trading activities.

Modernising the platforms
Trading platforms today should facilitate toward their users to connect with other traders using the same platform. It should also allow them to view in all trading activities of other traders whom seem interesting to them. The trading platform should also allow users to share trading ideas and opportunities socially. The platforms should transfer the trading experience into a social experience that is more fun and rewarding at the same time.

Another way to encourage an active trading behaviour is by influencing the crowd, which can be achieved by connecting experienced traders with individuals willing to follow them and copy their trading activities. Today social trading is becoming of great interest.

Providing customers with a facility to follow more experienced traders will be an important vehicle to create broker loyalty and increase customers’ trading volumes, especially for non-experienced customers or new to equity trading.

In general, attitudes vary toward trading as an individual or as part of a group based on the trust, given to successful traders within the group. In the Middle East region, social trading will be highly accepted, where many traders are giving special importance on the credibility of a broker or a successful trader than on the brokerage firm itself.

Furthermore, to capture the maximum customer time in anticipation of trades, brokerage firms should bring to their trading platforms everything their customers are interested in. This means messaging from their Facebook account or the incoming stream from selected Twitter accounts they wish to follow in order to make investment decisions. This needs to be done to maintain a single customer experience. The customer should see the incoming content as part of their trading platform.

It should be as easy as ‘Buy 300 stocks on market price’ from within Facebook

Brokerage firms should also inversely develop their trading platforms to receive orders from social media sites, and in plain language. So, for example, the customer can be chatting with their friends on Facebook and decide to place an order. It should be as easy as ‘Buy 300 stocks on market price’ from within Facebook.

All functionality should be fully integrated and provided to the customer as one solution. Today’s users want a simple, clean solution, not a complicated group of mixed applications with the hassle of integration. The whole process, from signing up to follow a successful trader, watching an analyst’s video, or announcing what he is doing on Facebook or Twitter must be straight-forward, easier, more convenient and efficient.

Another way to facilitate encouraging an active customer trading behaviour is to have a multi-channel platform. To allow customer trading on the move, brokerage firms have to provide their services over multiple channels – in branch, on the phone, online, on tablets, and on the mobile. As smartphones and tablets become more compact, convenient and more powerful, the variety has increased tremendously, as has the introduction of devices that support multiple kinds of inputs.

With all these advancements, it is clear that trading platforms have to be more flexible and accommodate more choice for their users.

The idea is to provide a consistent experience to customers across channels, while giving them seamless access to their financial information and services where and when they are needed. The customer should always be in control of which channel he or she feels more convenient to use in a certain moment. For example, as it is nearly impossible for anyone to be in front of the computer screen constantly, customer could begin a transaction using one channel, say on a PC, and close it using a mobile phone while on the move.

TradeNet allows brokerage firms to provide different channels for their customers to interact with their services, providing them with a seamless, pleasant experience. A customer has a single real-time updated view for their information, positions and holdings regardless from which channel is connected.

The suggested way of thinking and some of the ideas resulting from it, might require issues around security and regulations to be resolved, but the aim is to minimise the time and effort between information, decision and action.

IBM strikes shine light on China’s labour laws

Though the strike at the IBM plant in Shenzhen last week was highly disruptive, it had much wider implications than simply halting production for a few days. The strike, which involved over 1,000 workers, was the latest in a series of walk-outs to hit Chinese industries over the last three years, signalling the cementing of a new trend of industrial activism.

According to advocacy group China Labour Bulletin, there were 1,171 strikes and protests in the 18 months to December 2013, with the majority occurring in Guangdong Province, one of China’s main industrial hubs.

Chinese workers have been increasingly prone to strike action as labour shortages have tilted the balance of power in their favour

Chinese workers have been increasingly prone to strike action as labour shortages have tilted the balance of power in their favour. Shortages have also meant that employers have been forced to offer more attractive remuneration and benefit packages to workers, in order to entice them into staying.

Workers have started to protest when companies are bought and sold – often without their being notified – in order to ensure their favourable working conditions are preserved under the new owners.

Though it is down to circumstances that Chinese workers have suddenly found themselves with the upper hand in negotiations, it is an unprecedented situation that the government would do well to exploit.

In many of the recent strikes, workers have been arrested and convicted of a range of public order offences. Not only are these arrests misguided, they are downright damaging. Nothing will be gained by imprisoning strikers. China should instead take this opportunity to upgrade its labour protection provisions.

Though China has profited greatly from its cheap and vast labour force by attracting international companies to its industrial hubs; now is the time to protect its workers. A healthy and well-provided for workforce is by far more sustainable than an exploited one.

Furthermore, now that workers have realised how effective their actions can be, the Chinese government will do better to compromise than to instigate further actions by workers. Repression by authorities will likely only escalate actions by workers and may push them towards unionising.

Twenty workers were fired during the IBM strikes, and another 300 to 400 are said to have quit work entirely. Workers who agreed to return to work were offered a bonus by IBM – a dangerous and potentially costly move from the company. If adequate provisions for compensation had been in place, IBM and Lenovo, who are taking over the plant, would have budgeted adequately and not lost a week of production and half their workers.

By protecting workers rights, the government can ensure that conditions remain attractive for foreign companies looking to relocate to China, but also that the workforce is looked after and contented. By repressing protests violently, and with morally questionable arrests, authorities will only be increasing the risk for companies settled in the country, rather than mitigating them.

US Environmental Agency lifts BP government contract ban

BP has come to an agreement with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), bringing an end to the ban on government contracts imposed as a result of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster. First put in place in November of 2012, the EPA enforced ban effectively ruled the British-based oil and gas giant out of any federal government contracts, and slammed the brakes on one of the company’s four “key areas”.

BP has ploughed $50bn into its US operations over five years – more than any other energy firm

The restrictions were first introduced after the company pleaded guilty to numerous offences – amongst them being 11 counts of homicide – and followed a $4.5bn settlement with the Department of Justice, prompting BP to label EPA’s actions as “inappropriate and unjustified as a matter of law and policy.”

“After a lengthy negotiation, BP is pleased to have reached this resolution, which we believe to be fair and reasonable,” said John Mingé, chairman and president of BP America in a company statement.

“As a result of this agreement, BP is once again eligible to enter into new contracts with the US government, including new deepwater leases in the Gulf of Mexico.”

Under the terms of the agreement, which is set to expire in five years time, the company has agreed to certain parameters, concerning safety and operations, ethics and compliance, and corporate governance. BP has also decided to withdraw the lawsuit it filed against the EPA last year for improper statutory disqualification and suspension.

The deal also follows an appeal made by the UK government late last year, which read: “The government is concerned that such a broad sanction can and will have serious and unjustified economic consequences.”

BP has ploughed $50bn into its US operations over five years – more than any other energy firm – and employs approximately 20,000 people in all 50 states, so communication between the government and themselves is vital if the firm is to make progress.

Bad spell for Shell as it struggles to profit from US shale market

Even though the US shale revolution continues to gather pace, some of the world’s largest oil firms are having difficulty profiting from it. Royal Dutch Shell – the Anglo-Dutch oil and gas giant and biggest revenue making company in the world – has announced that it plans to scale back its US operations as a result of competition from shale operators.

While smaller firms have enjoyed great success in profiting from shale oil and gas reserves in North America, the likes of Shell, BP and Exxon Mobile have struggled to match them. While at the start of March BP spun off its onshore US oil and gas subsidiaries into a separate business, Shell has announced it will cut jobs in North America and reduce spending in the region by a fifth.

Financial performance there is frankly
not acceptable

Blaming a number of failed exploration efforts for shale in the region, Shell CEO Ben van Beurden said in a statement that the company was looking to undergo a “fundamental shake-up.” He added, “Financial performance there is frankly not acceptable. Some of our exploration bets have simply not worked out.”

Last year the company saw a huge fall in profits for its North American business. While in 2012 it made gains of $670m, 2013 saw it make a loss of $900m, as a result of lower gas prices and increased competition. He said that the company will continue to target divestments of assets worth $15bn for the coming year. These include over 700,000 acres of US shale assets, as well as cuts to onshore oil and gas staff in North America of around 30 percent.

Although Shell hasn’t had the success in shale that it had hoped, it will still make up a part of its strategy in the long-term, says van Beurden. “From 2014, tight-gas and liquids-rich shale will have a different role in our strategy. We see them as an opportunity for the longer term rather than the immediate future. And we are reducing the number of these opportunities in our North American portfolio as we strive to improve our financial performance.”

New Zealand bumps up interest rates as GDP flourishes

New Zealand’s interest rates are to rise to 2.75 percent, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) Governor Graeme Wheeler has announced. New Zealand’s economic growth has gained momentum in recent months, with the bank estimating that GDP has grown 3.3 percent in the year up to March.

The increase is supposed to be the first in a set of rate rises as the RBNZ aims to keep inflation near its two percent target midpoint. “With inflation now rising and inflationary pressures building, there is a need to return interest rates to more-normal levels,” the Central Bank said in its Monetary Policy Statement, stressing that rate rises “will depend on economic data and our continuing assessment of emerging inflationary pressures.” Surging house prices in the nation’s largest city, Auckland, have led to concerns of a bubble and have added to the country’s inflationary worries.

The FT is reporting that the rate may be increased by a total of 125 basis points in 2014, depending on economic data.

The growth of the economy in New Zealand has been driven by soaring dairy prices and also the $40bn rebuild of Christchurch, the city damaged in 2011’s earthquake. Demand for milk, particularly in China, has made New Zealand the world’s principal milk supplier and has stoked the flames of growth in the country’s $175bn economy.  Official figures show that the country maintained a three-month trade surplus in January, as exports to China grew 45 percent year-on-year from 2013.

Demand for milk, particularly in China, has made New Zealand the world’s principal
milk supplier

The news comes as the US Federal Reserve is not expected to raise interest rates until the third quarter of next year. The US central bank cut rates to a record low in December 2008 and promised to keep them there until the economy was on the mend. Meanwhile, the Bank of England Governor Mark Carney this week stressed that interest rates rises in the UK would have to be gradual to avoid choking the economy.

Wheeler said that “growth is gradually increasing in New Zealand’s trading partners” and that “global financial conditions continue to be very accommodating” for the country.

KIB receives top credit rating

There is indeed a lot to celebrate and cheer about. From stalwart beginnings, when Kuwait International Bank started operations in 1973, the bank had an all-encompassing approach and modelled its banking portfolio to cater to all international markets. Its business covers banking services, including the acceptance of deposits, financing transactions, direct investment, Murabaha (auto, real estate and commodities), Ijara Muntahia Bittamleek (lease-to-own), Istisna’a, Tawarruq, credit cards, Wakala and many other products.

KIB also provides corporate projects and finance, treasury services, letters of credit, letters of guarantee, real estate dealings and management of properties. This huge gamut of services has given KIB a wide customer base and has made it a market leader. KIB was one of the early banking institutions to embrace Islamic banking. The bank’s management recognised the interest that investors and the community at large expressed in Islamic banking and decided to adopt it early on.

This gave KIB a natural edge over competition. KIB’s large role in trading using Islamic financial products such as Islamic Sukuk made KIB rather crucial and one of the most recognised Islamic financial institutions in Kuwait.

Investors flocked to KIB and continue to do so. The key to stay ahead of the game has been to constantly innovate and embrace change, and KIB has mastered the art of it. Over the years, the opportunities in Kuwait’s banking industry have increased and the government has been keen to develop it further. The Kuwaiti banking sector is also by-and-large strong and stable in comparison to other economic sectors.

Taking responsibility seriously
KIB has been an active supporter and participant in the government’s plan for the banking industry. In the recently announced $130bn national development plan, KIB has formulated its own strategy with regard to the government’s initiative. The bank has studied the plan in depth – in particular the projects that are related to the banking and finance industry – and has prepared itself technically and financially to fulfil the government’s objectives by providing support to contractors, traders and service providers, while always adhering to the market and banking regulations set by the Commercial Bank of Kuwait (CBK) and the Capital Markets Authority.

With regard to international compliance, KIB is committed to work in accordance with all international regulations and is well placed to meet the demands of Basel III. The bank holds sufficient high-quality liquid assets and is committed to meeting Basel III’s requirements as prescribed by the CBK. We also have an independent Anti-Money Laundering Unit in order to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorism financing and other illegal activities.

KIB is also well prepared to face the fallout of the crisis in Egypt and Syria. Not only does it have a contingency plan in place, it has also taken certain measures based on the political situation in the region. KIB has and will always act in the best interests of its customers, striving to provide them with complete and uninterrupted banking solutions that enable them to carry on with their professional and personal lives as usual.

Ensuring customer satisfaction
Since July 1, 2007 – when KIB became sharia-compliant – the bank has worked for economic renaissance in Kuwait, with the objective of fulfilling its responsibility towards society and its people. KIB has worked hand-in-hand with the government and the private sector to achieve economic prosperity in the country.

As part of its social responsibility, KIB has drawn up an annual calendar of activities that include supporting sports, cultural, charitable, and religious activities, and providing for hospitals, nursing homes and children with special needs.

KIB has worked hand-in-hand with the government and the private sector to achieve economic prosperity in the country

KIB concentrates on doing a few things very well, which includes the active management of non-performing loans (NPL), which have improved overall ratios, profitability, liquidity and strong capital ratios, coupled with improved diversified growth in business. The excellent standards that KIB has achieved today are based on two significant elements: strong leadership and keeping up-to-date with technology.

KIB places great emphasis on attracting and retaining able and experienced leadership from inside and outside of Kuwait. Staff are trained regularly with a view to upgrading their capabilities in all necessary fields. Significant efforts have also been made to offer the latest electronic and online services to its customers. Customer satisfaction is a vital part of the bank’s strategy, and it has developed a range of services to enhance the banking experience, whether clients are domestic or operate internationally.

KIB also rewards its loyal customers with a host of special services and privileges wherever in the world they may be. One such privilege that is offered to its Visa Platinum and Gold cardholders is access to VIP lounges in airports around the world.

Furthermore, KIB is committed to offering modern, sharia-compliant products and to reach out to its customers by increasing its presence through various banking channels, including a wide network of branches, ATMs, mobile banking, and internet banking, to provide access to as many customers as possible.

A positive future ahead
Being one of the early adopters of Islamic banking presented KIB with both an advantage and a challenge. It transformed from what was once known as the Kuwait Real Estate Bank into Kuwait International Bank, one that offers a wide range of Islamic finance products. Today, almost all local banks have adopted Islamic banking. This works as a trigger for KIB to keep on innovating and enhance its products and services, so that it is way ahead of competition and remains a pioneer of local banking.

The continuous awards and achievements that KIB
has received are a
positive testimony to the bank’s success

Today, KIB operates with assets in excess of $4.9bn (as of September 2013) and offers a full range of Islamic finance products. KIB posted exceptional financial results in 2012, where operating profits exceeded KWD 21m and shareholders received seven percent in cash dividends. The bank continued this steady growth in the first nine months of 2013 by attaining operating profits of more than KWD 24m, and the last quarter looks promising and encouraging too.

In 2014, KIB will continue on its growth trajectory by providing appropriate Islamic financial products to its customers, such as Al Murabaha and Al Mussawamma, two important Islamic financial instruments. KIB will also expand its network by adding new branches in Kuwait, thereby increasing its reach and becoming more accessible to customers. KIB is also working closely with its corporate customers to identify their unique banking needs and to work out ways in which it can meet these needs. The bank believes this will further fuel growth and take it to greater levels of success.

Strong relationships
KIB has been widely recognised as a progressive, profitable and performance-oriented banking institution that has been pioneering and paving the way for growth and economic reform across Kuwait and the wider region. Fitch has upgraded KIB’s credit rating by two notches from A- to A+ due to its strong capitalisation, liquidity profile and strong capital ratios. This is no mean achievement given the financial crisis that has engulfed large parts of the globe.

The continuous awards and achievements that KIB has received are a positive testimony to the bank’s success: this, and the fact that its customers have placed so much trust in it. Most of KIB’s customers are loyal to the bank, providing valuable insight into how banking needs to evolve over time and how a bank can help them grow in their own businesses.

KIB has exceptional relationships with all of its corporate and retail customers. This has led to widespread satisfaction among its customers and has given KIB the opportunity to innovate for the betterment of its customers and the industry at large. This has also led to greater progress, profitability, and has been an impetus for top performance.

KIB has also been honoured with the Best Islamic Bank, Kuwait, 2014 award in World
Finance’s Islamic Finance Awards. The bank also received the Golden Medal Award of Merit 2013 from the Tatweej Academy for Excellence and Quality in the Arab Region, and it is one of the few leading financial institutions to publish its corporate governance manual in both Arabic and English, emphasising its commitment to transparency.

In conclusion, it is only apt to quote famous pastor and author Charles Spurgeon, who once said: “It’s not the having, it’s the getting.”  This seems truly pertinent for KIB – be it in the ‘getting’ of customers or the receipt of awards.

Gulfstream Aerospace flies ahead of the pack

The past decade has seen the business aviation industry expand its international presence and exhibit promise in emerging markets. However, the economic downturn has resulted in a bifurcated market, impacting on sales of smaller aircraft more so than those of large-cabin, long-range aircraft.

World Finance spoke to Gulfstream Aerospace’s Vice President of Communications, Steve Cass, about recent developments in the industry, and how they have impacted on the General Dynamics subsidiary.

Tell us about your business and how you have capitalised on industry changes
We’ve been in the business of business aviation for more than 55 years. Since we delivered our first business jet (a GII in January 1968), we have delivered over 2,100 business jets to our customers. We’re focused solely on the business aviation sector, and our ability to provide technologically advanced products that are safe, comfortable and reliable is definitely a differentiator for us.

In terms of the industry’s future, we envision the widespread acceptance of business aviation as a powerful and impactful worldwide economic engine that not only provides countless benefits to its users but to people around the world who work in the industry.

Gulfstream Aerospace

3,800

Employees

2,100

Business jets delivered

In 2007, Gulfstream saw its sales shift from primarily domestic to primarily international. This catapulted us from being a Georgia company with a worldwide presence to a worldwide company with a Georgia presence. Since then, the domestic/international breakdown has remained steadily at 50:50.

Nevertheless, as our international fleet continues to grow, so too does our network. In 2012, we opened Gulfstream Beijing and became the first original equipment manufacturer to establish a factory service centre in Asia.

We also enhanced our presence in Latin America with a Gulfstream service centre in Sorocaba, Brazil, and expanded our spare parts inventory, positioning more than $1.4bn in spare parts strategically around the world. At the same time, we increased customer access to aircraft sales support around the world and enhanced our sales presence in Africa, the Middle East, Russia and Dubai.

Last year we opened a Sales and Design Centre in London, the company’s first such facility outside the US. The nearly 5,500-square-foot centre, located in the Mayfair district of central London, gives international customers more convenient access to Gulfstream’s sales and design staff.

What differentiates your services from those of your competitors?
We have the largest company-operated product support organisation in business aviation, with more than 3,800 employees, 11 company-owned service centres, seven factory-authorised service centres and 14 authorised warranty facilities. To further facilitate this growth, in 2013 we added 150 employees worldwide in product support.

Gulfstream aircraft are known for their performance, cabin size, comfort, technology and reliability. The Gulfstream G650, which we announced in March 2008 and began delivering to customers in December 2012, had one of the most successful product launches in the business-aviation industry. After the aircraft’s introduction, we received in excess of 200 orders, in no small part due to the G650’s reputation for speed and comfort.

To what extent is technological investment key to your success and the success of the wider industry?
Technological investment is paramount to the success of both our business and the industry as a whole. Throughout the downturn, we continued to invest heavily in research and development, so that we’d be well positioned for a market recovery. This included investment in our two newest products, the G650 and G280, which were announced shortly before the downturn in 2008 and entered service in 2012, as well as continued investment in our existing products.

What are your plans for the future?
We’ll continue with the $500m, seven-year facilities expansion we announced in November 2010 for our Savannah site. Emerging markets that previously seemed hesitant about business aviation have begun to accept, and even embrace it. China, in particular, has made tremendous strides in terms of streamlining flight planning and establishing the infrastructure necessary to make the country a business aviation hub. We’ll continue to see the growth of this region and others, as well, including Brazil, Russia and India.

There’s plenty of room for these regions to grow: the US still has the lion’s share of business aircraft, with more than 11,000, compared to the remaining 8,000 worldwide, and those figures alone demonstrate the tremendous potential of this industry.

Sentinel Retirement Fund: ‘informal pensions problematic’

Institutions are subjected to intense scrutiny with regards to how they invest money responsibly. While this is very much the case for the entire financial spectrum, it is especially pertinent in the case of pension funds, given that they harbour the precious savings on which individuals depend.

Retirement funds today are expected to exercise a responsible culture when it comes to risk taking, and to educate their clients about the risks they’re exposing themselves to.

“Our fund only accepts as much risk as is necessary to optimise payoff to members and pensioners per the stated portfolio targets and risk tolerance levels,” says Eric Visser, CEO of Sentinel Retirement Fund (see Fig. 1), who believes a responsible, liability-driven investment approach to be best practice.

“[The] approach followed by the fund, which incorporates an asset liability modelling process, is designed to specifically assess investment and liability related risks in setting asset allocation limits,” says Visser.

It is with this level of client service and flexibility that the fund has become one of the largest self-administered, defined-contribution, umbrella pension funds in South Africa and promises good things for the foreseeable future.

“Our mission is to position and grow Sentinel to provide sustainable retirement solutions to all market sectors,” he adds.

Sentinel-Retirement-Fund-12-month-investment-returns

The fund, which as of June 30 last year actively managed ZAR 48bn, maintains a strict asset allocation and rebalancing policy designed to ensure risks are controlled and mitigated.

“Investment risks are evaluated at fund and mandate level against predetermined limits using traditional risk measurements,” says Visser. “In addition, individual investment managers are required to monitor risk at mandate level. Three sources of investment risks are measured: asset allocation, investment mandate and manager selection.”

“Sentinel does not have a sponsor employer/organisation and the pensioner portfolio must therefore be self-sustaining,” says Visser. “This portfolio is evaluated monthly based on the calculation of estimated funding levels by management in consultation with the fund investment consultant and actuary. Through the investment consultant and consulting actuary, a monthly review of the discount rate applicable to value pensioner liabilities is performed.

“Factors included in the calculation of the discount rate are dividend yield forecasts, yield to maturity (using the entire term structure of interest rates), fund cash flows and changes in the discount rate, which will lead to a revision of annuity values applicable to new entrants. The consulting actuary also performs a formal interim valuation annually and a statutory valuation every three years. Mortality assumptions are monitored and reviewed with each valuation and proactively adjusted based on actual experience and general trends in the industry.”

Past and present
According to Sentinel’s 2013 annual report, the fund received ZAR 1.99bn worth of annual contributions from 31,108 members and distributed ZAR 2.11bn of pension payments to 22,222 pensioners. Sentinel has taken significant steps to boost its national credibility of late, and established a reputation as a responsible investor.

“Sentinel has a proud heritage of securing the retirement fund benefits of employees dating back to 1946,” says Visser. “As stated, Sentinel follows a liability-driven investment approach. Asset liability modelling is performed in cycles of 18 months (maximum). This process incorporates the funds’ view of all asset class risk/return expectations and ensures that the fund, in pursuit of meeting performance objectives, only employs as much risk as is necessary to optimise payoff to members and pensioners. The resulting asset allocation provides the guideline to assessing any investment strategy.

“Management and the investment consultant continuously scan the investment horizon for new investment ideas, through informal meetings with managers and global networking. Should an idea pass this initial phase, a formal due diligence [process] by both management and the investment consultant will follow. If successful, a submission will be made to the investment committee for consideration.”

Sentinel Retirement Fund, 2013

ZAR1.99bn

Annual contributions

31,108

Members

ZAR2.11bn

Pension payments

22,222

Pensioners

The fund’s investment committee, in conjunction with the investment consultant, will then assess the anticipated outcome of a particular investment strategy on a number of factors, including the overall risk/return profile; portfolio diversification; how it could assist in mitigating vulnerability to specific key risks; and to what extent it could change the fund’s exposure to specific key risks. Once both parties feel the risks have been properly accounted for and client expectations have been taken into consideration, the fund will then embark upon its chosen investment strategy.

“The fund has a diversified investment structure and all major asset classes are covered, including equity, property and fixed income,” says Visser. “Alternative investment strategies include private equity, unlisted real estate, hedge fund, credit and tactical asset allocation. The fund is furthermore geographically diversified across the globe with exposure to… developed markets, emerging markets (ex-Africa) and Africa.”

Sentinel is also subject to regulation that limits its foreign exposure to 25 percent, plus an additional five percent to the rest of Africa, thus a total of 30 percent at any given time. Regulatory limits have also set exposure caps on various asset classes, individual investments and alternative investment strategies.

Perhaps the most significant development of 2013, however, was the fund’s decision to merge with the Mine Employees Pension Fund on July 1.

“Members and pensioners benefit from a single larger entity through greater economies of scale, which provides for cost efficiencies and reduced duplication over the longer term. Investment growth will also be maximised while member growth opportunities can be focussed on,” says Visser.

“Strategically, Sentinel will also be better positioned in terms of [the] government’s retirement reform initiatives, where a clear preference has been shown for large industry funds as these funds provide cost-effective retirement savings solutions.”

The South African market
Pension provision in South Africa has undergone quite considerable changes of late in an attempt to boost access and provision for those partaking in a scheme.

“In the formal sector for employees who hold permanent employment contracts, retirement saving is largely regulated through employment contracts and therefore compulsory,” says Visser.

“However, preservation of retirement savings throughout an individual’s career is not compulsory and many individuals access their retirement savings when changing employment to reduce/settle debt or simply to spend. This results in the majority of South Africans reaching retirement with insufficient capital provision.

With very high levels of unemployment and a huge informal sector that provides little retirement saving opportunities, South Africa still has much to do to ensure individuals
reach retirement

“The informal sector, which plays a huge role in the South African economy, provides very little, if any, access to retirement provision. A government Old Age Pension is in place but pays a nominal monthly pension to those who qualify in terms of a means test.”

Over the past 24 months, however, the government, through the National Treasury, has announced a number of proposed reforms to both the retirement and savings industries. These reforms are expected to be implemented over the next 24 months and include compulsory preservation of retirement savings (only on monies invested after implementation).

Sentinel has for a number of years focused on member education through the provision of an advisory service that seeks to assist members with retirement planning and inform them of the dangers when accessing retirement savings prematurely. This strategy has encouraged a great deal of the fund’s members to preserve their retirement capital when exiting the fund.

In recent years, access to retirement savings opportunities may very well have increased, given that new products have entered the market, combined with the loosening of regulations governing certain retirement savings vehicles such as retirement annuities.

“The challenge, however, is ensuring the preservation of retirement capital throughout an individual’s working career,” says Visser. “The National Treasury’s forced preservation proposal will go a long away [towards] providing a solution, but this proposal only impacts new savings after implementation date and may therefore take many years to be fully effective.

“With very high levels of unemployment and a huge informal sector that provides little retirement saving opportunities, South Africa still has much to do to ensure individuals reach retirement and can financially support themselves.”

Given that responsible funds such as Sentinel educate beneficiaries about the many risks involved, the market for pensions in South Africa looks set to improve.

Britain: broke and battered, or back for business?

Vilified though they often are, foreign exchange traders do at least do their homework. And they like what they see in the sterling, one of the world’s oldest currencies. Between August 2013 and mid-January 2014, the British pound improved by eight percent against the dollar and by five percent against the euro as the fx-jockeys decided to back Britain.

And after a few false starts since the onset of the financial crisis, the sterling’s gains are now based on fundamentals rather than on a frenetic search for yield. “The difference between this particular recovery compared to previous ones is that it looks to be more broad-based,” explains Chris Towner, Director of HiFX, a London-based foreign exchange advisory service. “[The gains] don’t involve just the service sector but manufacturing and construction too.”

And he could have added a long-awaited surge in the retail sector. In an unexpected Christmas present for Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, Britain’s shops recorded a 2.6 percent jump in sales during a Yuletide spending spree. Ultimately, retailers rang up the biggest annual gains in nine years in what economy-watchers described as a sign of consumer confidence.

The other numbers that traders like to study are also coming up on the plus side for the sterling. The unemployment rate has been falling steadily and, early in the New Year, dropped as low as 7.4 percent, meaning an extra 250,000 new jobs had been created during 2013. Just as pleasing to Her Majesty’s Treasury, which fears an abrupt return to growth may trigger a rise in prices across the board, the inflation rate is sinking. At the start of 2014, the consumer price index was heading towards the official target of two percent for the first time in four years.

[R]etailers rang up the biggest annual gains in nine years in what economy-watchers described as a sign of consumer confidence

Combined, these numbers prompt Towner to predict that “the pound should continue to benefit from the strengthening economic backdrop through 2014.”

Desperate measures
If the sterling does indeed bounce back, it will have been a long hard fight since the financial crisis. As the economy fell off a cliff in much the same way as it did in Europe and the US, the Bank of England adopted similarly desperate measures as the US Federal Reserve. It slashed the bank rate, the benchmark measure for the price of credit, to historically low levels – in fact from 5.75 percent in late 2007 to 0.5 percent in early 2009 – and turbo-charged the printing presses under what quickly became quaintly known as ‘quantitative easing’ or, an even better circumlocution, the ‘asset purchase programme’. Billions of new money was poured into the economy, with the IOUs now held by the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street.

Britain was ill-prepared for the crisis. Individually, Britons had gone on a debt-funded spending spree that broke all records – collectively they owed £1.2trn, more than the nation’s total GDP. And some of the biggest banks did their best to encourage it with 130-percent mortgages that fuelled a house-price bubble.

The government itself was heavily over-borrowed after years of deficits. But that was only reported debt – on top of the official debt had to be added pension and other obligations that added up to at least another £1trn. On top of all this, the UK had the world’s worst banking crisis after Wall Street. It has emerged since then that prime minister Gordon Brown considered ordering out the army to maintain law and order in the event of a general run on the City – heart of the financial sector.

For the vulnerable state of the UK, most economists lay the blame squarely on the Labour government ousted in the wake of the crisis – and particularly on its wild spending on the public sector, often labelled as the non-productive element in the economy. In the vital year of 2008-09, the government was still pouring £630bn into the public sector, compared with £389bn just seven years earlier. For the first time in British wage history, civil servants earned more on average than those in the private sector. They also luxuriated in feather-bedded conditions, including pensions that were – and still are – far more generous than those prevailing in the business world.

And despite savage cuts by the new Conservative government, it will take years to roll back these gold-plated conditions. “The reality is that the UK public sector is grotesquely over-managed to the detriment of the national finances, but of the front-line workers and of the users of social services as well,” argued economist Dr Tim Morgan, in a devastating analysis of how bloated government had become.

But nor was the business world in a fit state to ride out the storm. The dirty secret of Britain’s commercial sector was its poor productivity, roughly 10 percent below Germany’s and a massive 20 percent below that of the US (see Fig. 1).

And while most of Europe’s leader nations long ago adopted measures to protect from foreign takeovers of their ‘champion companies’ – giant businesses that would help them work through the post-2008 rubble – Britain has for decades allowed nearly all its iconic companies to fall into other hands. The list includes Heathrow Airport – indeed, much of its aviation infrastructure – the entire automobile and railway manufacturing industries, and most of the energy companies.

“Britain is almost alone among major developed economies in that it has allowed its utilities, airports and other key strategic assets to become foreign-owned”, points out Dr Morgan.

Temporary triumph?
But does the recovery of the sterling presage a genuine economic recovery after many a false dawn? As the Bank of England’s Chief Economist Spencer Dale wondered out loud in a speech in December: “Why, after throwing everything bar the kitchen sink at the economy over the past few years, has it started to grow only now?”

Dale, who also holds the crucial role of Executive Director of Monetary Policy, attributes Britain’s fightback to two main factors. First, after a long drought, credit is finally flowing more easily to companies and households, a welcome event that Dale attributes partly to a stronger banking sector. And second, that elusive but vital element in any recovery – economic confidence – is higher. “It seems clear to me that uncertainty and fear greatly amplified the initial impact of the financial crisis,” he explained. “The good news is that the cloud of uncertainty has started to lift [and] can provide a powerful spur to recovery.”

But things won’t be the same as they were. As the UK fights back from the brink, its chequered relationship with the crisis-hit EU is undergoing an agonised examination. The influential Confederation of British Industry (CBI) – the main lobby group for industry and the business world in general – has concluded that Europe no longer offers the promise it once did. After all, the 28-nation bloc narrowly escaped the collapse of the euro and the currency is still not completely out of the woods. At least half of the economies are weak, including some of the biggest, such as Italy, Spain and France, and it will take years of painful restructuring to restore to full working order.

Although the CBI doesn’t advocate a summary withdrawal from the bloc – “we should remain in a reformed EU”, argues Chief Executive John Cridland – the organisation has run out of patience with Brussels’ notorious talent for empire-building and red tape – the much-feared ‘regulatory creep’. Explains Cridland: “There is particular annoyance at the sense of a creeping extension of EU authority regulating on trivial issues sometimes counter to the wishes of the UK and its citizens.” And although many Britons individually reveal a growing impatience with Brussels’ relentless rule making, they remain direct beneficiaries. According to McKinsey, membership of the EU is worth approximately a net £1,200 to every UK household.

Similarly, while eight out of 10 members of the CBI have no intention of turning their backs on the EU, mainly because it still provides their bread and butter, they are looking beyond the land mass just over the channel to more exciting markets. In effect, Britain, which prides itself on being a great trading nation, has rested on its laurels and relied too much on the opportunities on its doorstep. As a major recent CBI study points out, less than three percent of UK’s total exports go to China and less than seven percent are sold in the four big BRIC nations (see Fig. 2).

Debt mountain
Britain is still mired in debt. By the estimates of consultancy Tullett Prebon, the UK government will, by the end of next year, bear the burden of some £3.15trn in debt. That’s a towering 180 percent of GDP. As Dr Morgan has warned, “the bill [for the crisis] hasn’t turned up yet.”

And although individual Britons have been paying back their credit cards, they still hold record levels of consumer debt and many are struggling to make ends meet. The Trades Union Congress estimates that the average worker has suffered a 6.3 percent fall in real terms in their pay packets in the last five years (see Fig. 3) – and the Bank of England agrees in general. That represents a loss of around £30 a week. And, as the Centre for Research in Social Policy, an economic think tank, points out, the cost of living is rising faster than average earnings.

“There’s a plethora of evidence pointing to the extent to which real wages have fallen in Britain since the crisis,” says Professor Kim Hoque of the Warwick Business School. He supports the idea of a “living wage” – higher than the minimum wage – that would allow the lowest-paid to enjoy an acceptable quality of life.

On the bright side, the giant mortgage lenders heaved a sigh of relief in January when the housing market hit its highest point in six years. That means that a few thousand more mortgagees no longer owe more than their property is worth.

The turnaround
There’s still a lot to be done. As Dale points out, the scars are still deep: “Yes, our economy appears to have turned a corner. And yes, there are good reasons for optimism that the recovery will persist. But we can’t take it for granted. There’s still a long way to go.”

Britain’s biggest banks are only halfway through a process that will take them back to their roots by splitting higher-risk investment activities from the traditional deposit-taking role. “Banks are going to need to significantly change their business models,” explains Professor Andre Spicer of the Cass Business School. “They will need to move out of more risky and lucrative markets and become simpler, more conservative and more sustainable institutions.” Under the new model, the investment-banking arm will no longer be able to rely on the government safety net that pulled them through the crisis.

Nobody knows exactly how the Bank of England will extricate the UK from quantitative easing, although officials are working on it. And that’s just the official IOUs. It will take a lot of penny-pinching before the nation’s credit cards are restored to order.

Nor can anybody accurately quantify the effect of the possible secession of Scotland from the UK. In September, its citizens will vote in a referendum to stay or leave the UK, after an independence campaign vigorously espoused by First Minister Alex Salmond. With just a few months to go, it’s believed the vote will be close.

Like other European economies, Britain still has a long way to go. Perhaps the last word should be left to the central bank, which did so much to guide the nation through the Great Recession. “The damage and losses associated with the financial crisis and the years of frustration and disappointment that followed won’t be reversed simply by one or two quarters of strong growth,” predicts Dale.

Never dull at Lloyd’s of London: 1688 to present

For such a venerable and pioneering financial institution, it is somewhat surprising that insurance market Lloyd’s of London is still looked at with considerable suspicion by many within the global business community. Despite a long and successful history, the scandals that hit towards the end of the 1980s – and the ensuing losses of colossal proportions to policyholders – have meant that Lloyd’s has struggled to recapture the lustre that it once held.

However, perhaps now is time that global investors, and particularly those in the US, look at Lloyds with renewed interest. A marketplace known for insuring almost anything has undergone the necessary reforms to ensure that policyholders are suitably protected, but also allows for the sorts of returns and investments not possible elsewhere.

Not many of the world’s most prestigious financial institutions can claim to emerge from such humble beginnings as a coffee shop, but that is exactly where the world’s oldest insurance market first developed in London. In 1688, in the back rooms of Lloyd’s Coffee House, a market formed that would dominate the insurance world for centuries.

Originally focused on the shipping industry, with merchant ships being insured by many of the coffee house’s customers. It moved from Lloyd’s Coffee House to new premises at the Royal Exchange on Cornhill in 1774, where it perfected the art of people pooling – and therefore spreading – risk, and subsequently became the primary place for insuring against all sorts of events.

Defining the structure
Lloyd’s is in a unique position in that it is not itself a corporation, but instead considered a market by UK law. Lloyd’s itself does not underwrite policies, but it acts as the market where individual market makers known as ‘Names’ offer to underwrite many types of policy, offering unlimited liability, meaning their entire wealth could be seized in the event of a claim.

‘Names’ are essentially the underwriters at Lloyd’s, and can include internal Lloyd’s members and external investors. General insurance and reinsurance are covered at Lloyd’s, with underwriters coming together to form syndicate funds that then offer policies to clients. Investing in a syndicate at Lloyd’s is unlike buying a normal security. Instead, investors are made Members of the syndicate for a one-year period, known as the ‘Lloyd’s Annual Venture’, and the syndicate would then be dissolved at the end of that period.

Lloyd’s of London timeline

1688

Humble beginnings in the back of Lloyd’s Coffee House

1774

Moves to new premises at Royal Exchange on Cornhill

1871

Lloyd’s Act passed into government

1980s

Scandal swirls among accusations of fraud and incompetence

2000s

Reputation repair: Lloyd’s starts to make a comeback

The syndicate is then re-formed the next year, often having the same members as before. The Council of Lloyd’s manages the market, which is responsible for supervising the activities going on. These activities are made up of two distinct groups: the Members that provide capital and insurance agents or brokers that underwrite the risks and act on behalf of the Members.

Known for taking on pretty much any insurance policy, a vast number of bizarre things have been secured through the Lloyd’s market. These have included world-famous food critic Egon Ronay insuring his taste buds for $400,000 in 1957.

This was surpassed in 2009 when Costa Coffee took out a £10m policy against the prospect of their chief coffee taster, Gennaro Pelliccia, losing his sense of taste. 20th Century Fox insured actress Betty Grable’s legs for $1m each in the 1940s due to her huge popularity, while Australian cricketer Merv Hughes insured his trademark moustache for $370,000. Perhaps one of the highest profile policies was the one Irish dancer Michael Flatley took out for his legs in 2000, worth a staggering $47m.

With its iconic building, Lloyd’s also forms a distinct part of London’s Square Mile. Designed in the late 1970s by architect Richard Rogers, it is notable for looking as though it has been constructed inside out, with lifts and ducts found on the exterior of the building. Finished in 1986, the Lloyd’s building signified the dominance of the market during that period, but perhaps also represents the extravagance of the period.

Beginning of the trouble
Lloyd’s was formerly recognised in British law after the 1871 Lloyd’s Act, while the subsequent 1911 Act clarified the market’s objectives, which were to promote the interests of members and provide market information. By the 1970s, concerns arose around the tax structure of the UK’s financial markets, resulting in sweeping reforms to many sectors.

Lloyd’s was affected by the increase of earned income tax to 83 percent, resulting in syndicates preferring to make small underwriting losses in return for larger investment profits. Syndicates also began moving offshore, creating a situation that would later cause a great deal of controversy. At the start of the 1980s, Lloyd’s governing Council undertook plans to overhaul its regulatory framework, which would then become the Lloyd’s Act of 1982.

Lloyd’s of London still carries a negative reputation in the US, where many investors were badly burnt by their experiences of before

Designed to give the external Names, who were not involved on a day-to-day basis at Lloyd’s, a greater say in the running of the business, it also saw ownership of the managing agents of the Lloyd’s syndicates separated from the insurance broking firms. The hope was that this would mean an elimination of conflicts of interest between the syndicates and the brokers.

The reputation and integrity of Lloyd’s took a catastrophic hit in the 1980s as a result of the asbestos scandal. In the US, surprisingly large settlements on asbestos and pollution (APH) policies led to huge claims. A number of US states accused Lloyd’s of large-scale fraud, particularly the apparent withholding of knowledge regarding the level of asbestos and pollution claims. Lloyd’s was accused of encouraging investors to take on liabilities even though the market knew that colossal claims dating back decades were being made.

US regulators subsequently charged Lloyd’s and its associates with fraud and the selling of unregistered securities. This included Ian Posgate, one of Lloyd’s leading underwriters, who was charged with taking money from investors as part of a clandestine plan to buy a Swiss bank; a charge he was later acquitted of.

The asbestos claims were hard to predict because they affected workers many decades before. For example, a factory worker from the 1960s that was exposed to asbestos may have only developed health issues decades later, resulting in his suing his employer for compensation. The employer would then claim for insurance on a policy drawn up twenty years beforehand, before the real risks associated with asbestos were known. The ultimate result was the bankruptcy of thousands of investors in Lloyd’s syndicates as a result of the unforeseen risks.

Archaic accounting
As syndicates last a year and were accounted for separately, despite their continuing nature, there would be numerous separate incarnations of the syndicate. Liabilities could be carried over each year because of the way profits and losses were accounted, resulting in current syndicate members having to pick up the bill for policies written many years previously. Many holders felt this was an unfair system and had not been properly explained before investing.

Perhaps one of the most controversial factors of the scandal is the policy dubbed ‘recruit to dilute’, where some Lloyd’s officials were said to have deliberately sought new Names in advance of the forthcoming asbestos claims. This was reportedly done in the full knowledge that there was an impending wave of claims over asbestos. In the subsequent court cases over the losses, claims of ‘recruit to dilute’ were rejected, although the judge said that the Names at Lloyd’s that had lost their money were “the innocent victims… of staggering incompetence.”

As the world continues to experience ever-more uncertain political and environmental events, an insurance market such as Lloyd’s is the perfect place to secure against the worst possible outcomes

The result of all these issues was that many Names that were exposed to the asbestos claims lost vast sums of money, and in many cases were declared bankrupt as a result of the unlimited liability of the policies. In the aftermath, new Names at Lloyd’s that joined after 1994 did so with limited liability. Financial requirements for underwriting were also reformed, with checks made to ensure there were enough liquid assets available to back any losses.

Obviously acting as an insurance underwriter will always carry a good deal of risk, but the policies employed by many at Lloyd’s during this period clearly didn’t offer the necessary protections to those they had signed up.

While Lloyd’s has rebounded since its catastrophic period in the early 1990s, it has begun to face increased competition from newer markets elsewhere. However, the flexibility offered at Lloyd’s puts it in a unique position, with all manner of eventualities being offered for insurance. As the world continues to experience ever-more uncertain political and environmental events, an insurance market such as Lloyd’s is the perfect place to secure against the worst possible outcomes.

Lloyd’s of London still carries a negative reputation in the US, where many investors were badly burnt by their experiences of before. However, in light of the banking crisis that saw the market’s namesake in the UK partly nationalised, Lloyd’s – and insurance in general – is seen as much safer bet than traditional banking investments. A renewed focus on assessing risk has also meant that Lloyd’s is a much more secure place to put money than it was many years ago.

Speaking to the Economist in 2012, Rob Childs, of Lloyd’s syndicate Hiscox, said that attitudes to Lloyd’s had changed over the last 20 years, in contrast to those towards its namesake. “If you were at a dinner party and someone asked where you worked, you’d be happy if people thought Lloyd’s was a bank. Now, 20 years later, it’s the reverse.”

Such an old and experienced marketplace has played an integral part of London’s financial market, as well as helping to develop the global insurance industry that we see today. Tradition still plays an important part in the day-to-day activities at Lloyd’s, with business conducted in person and brokers queuing to do business with underwriters. While it may not be the risky place it once was, there is still the diverse range of insurance activities that the typical insurance houses wouldn’t dream of offering.

Strange items insured by Lloyd’s of London

From Bruce Springsteen to Michael Flatley, Lloyd’s of London really did live up to its reputation of being an ‘insure almost anything’ market. Here are some of the strangest ‘items’ to be covered by one of their policies.

Harvey Lowe’s hands, 1932-1945, $150,000

Harvey-Lowe's-hands

Betty Grable’s Legs, 1940s, $2m

Betty-Grable's-legs

Ken Dodd’s teeth, 1967-1992, $7.4m

Ken-Dodd

Merv Hughes’ Moustache, 1985-1994

Merv-Hughes-moustache

Bruce Springsteen’s voice, 1980s, $6m

Bruce-Springsteen

Michael Flatley’s legs, 2000-present, $47m

Michael-Flatley

Indonesia no longer ‘fragile’ insists deputy finance minister

Indonesia’s Deputy Finance Minister Bambang Brodjonegoro has told an investor conference in Jakarta that Indonesia should no longer be perceived as ‘fragile’ after a year of reparative fiscal policy. Brojonegoro was referring to a Morgan Stanley report published last year in which the Indonesia was included in a group of struggling emerging economies dubbed the “fragile five”.

“It is not just because I work for the government but because the latest economic indicators have showed significant improvement,” he told investors at an even organised by Fitch in the capital, according to the FT.

Other countries included in Morgan Stanley’s “fragile five” have not recovered as fast as Indonesia, in part because they did not respond as fast

According to Morgan Stanley, the “fragile five” economies – Brazil, India, Indonesia, Turkey and South Africa – all suffer from “high and rising current account deficits that make them more dependent on foreign capital flow”. They were therefore the worst hit countries when the American Federal Reserve started tapering its fiscal policies.

The deputy minister’s comments come after a year of aggressive action by the Indonesian central bank, in which it abandoned attempts to artificially hold up the rupiah, and instead allowed it to float. This led to a depreciation of close to 14 percent between May 2013 and February 2014, which in turn made Indonesian exports more competitive in the international market.

During this time, Indonesia’s current account deficit had stood at an alarming 4.4 percent of the GDP- over $10bn. It has since dropped to around $4bn, or two percent of GDP. Because of the favourable conditions, in December the country registered it’s highest trade surplus in over two years as merchandise exports rose by over 10.3 percent from the same time the previous year.

Other countries included in Morgan Stanley’s “fragile five” have not recovered as fast as Indonesia, in part because they did not respond as fast. Indonesia also raised interest rates more gradually than its counterparts, which combined with the natural currency devaluation led to an increase of 5.7 percent of the GDP in the fourth quarter.

Investors have also responded positively; the stock market is rallying, and the rupiah is no longer struggling against the dollar, having risen close to seven percent so far this year. Yields on 10-year government bonds are also performing well, having come down to eight percent from highs of 9.2 last summer.

Cryptic crypto: is Bitcoin escaping tax liabilities?

“If you mow your neighbour’s lawn, it doesn’t matter if he pays you $20 in cash or $20 worth of Bitcoins (or $20 worth of tomatoes for that matter), you are still legally required to report that as income. When using Bitcoin for payment, the taxing authorities may be less likely to be aware of the payments, but try to mow 10,000 neighbour’s lawns and not report the income,” read a somewhat suspect note of caution on the Bitcoin wiki earlier in the year. This, it would seem, is representative of a penchant for tax avoidance among the cryptocurrency community, who believe their illegitimate dealings in this space are masked by anonymity.

Some might say the age of the island retreat has passed and in its stead has come the safe haven that is the cryptocurrency, which has attracted a wave of new users whose intentions lie not only in subverting fiat currency, but in evading the tax authorities.

An unknown quantity
A sense of obscurity, which first arose with the birth of the Bitcoin five years ago, is something that has served to complicate the ways in which cryptocurrencies are understood, and it is this that has riled debate concerning how it should be taxed.

“This is not a new compliance problem by any stretch; it’s really the same one you have with cash, and virtual currency is very similar to cash inasmuch as it’s incredibly difficult for the IRS to track,” says the Director of Tax Issues at the US Government Accountability Office (GAO), James White. “We just don’t know the true extent of the compliance problem. We’ve found that the data out there isn’t very good, especially on the nature of virtual currency transactions. Sure, you can get some information about the total volume of transactions, but whether those transactions are taxable and what jurisdiction they’re coming from, that’s a lot harder to identify.”

According to peer-to-peer-network-generated statistics on Blockchain, over 98 million Bitcoin transactions were recorded as of January 17, although the log offers little to no indication of how many taxable events may well have occurred in this time. It is this ambiguity that has seen many label cryptocurrency as a means to a criminal end.

However, contrary to popular opinion, cryptocurrency transactions are far from anonymous, and do in fact leave a trail of data in their wake, especially on various centralised services such as exchanges and wallets. Although not all codes can be traced to their source, a lot of information can be dissected with the appropriate technical tools and knowhow. Granted, Bitcoin transaction records, or ‘block chains’, do present a few complications, namely for those tracking the actual individual involved as opposed to an IP address, but what is quite clear is that they are far more transparent than cash.

What is a cryptocurrency?
For this reason, the actual scale of non-compliance among cryptocurrency users should be considered secondary to the essential task of understanding exactly how it is they should be taxed once they are traced. The problem need not be any larger than cash, provided an agreement can be reached on the specific tax liabilities that apply to the phenomenon.

“The tax authorities have been playing a wait-and-see game on this question for quite some time. Only now, following 12 months of rapid growth in the market (approximately $10bn today) are they trying to determine if they can slot digital currencies into pre-existing categories with ready-made tax regimes,” says Richard Asquith, Head of Tax at TMF Group. “Initially, tax authorities labelled virtual currencies as vouchers, however, this is now changing as it is clear they are a store of wealth in their own right and their values can fluctuate. Consequently there is growing pressure for them to be re-categorised as private currency. The closest ‘real world’ example is gold, in particular gold sovereigns, which is used for both short-term trading and longer term investment and as a hedge against sovereign currencies/equities trading.”

For all intents and purposes, cryptocurrencies are subject to much the same tax liabilities as any other asset, or currency for that matter. However, the issue here is not one of tax itself, but rather one of uncertainty; and an uncertainty that will continue to confound users and authorities alike for as long as the IRS and authorities like them neglect to pin down and properly address what a cryptocurrency is.

“It’s very difficult right now in the US to develop a good estimate of whether there is much in the way of tax revenue being lost, and this is partly why we recommend the IRS puts up informal guidance on the matter,” says White. “Because there is so much speculation out there, we feel it is important for the IRS to be out in public saying something on the matter.”

Taxable gains lost through cryptocurrency transactions are often a product of misunderstanding as opposed to any deliberate attempt to evade authorities, which serves to underline the importance of putting an official framework in place. “If taxpayers using virtual currencies turn to the internet for tax help, they may find misinformation in the absence of clear guidance from the IRS. For example, when we performed a simple internet search for information on taxation of Bitcoin transactions, we found a number of websites, wikis, and blogs that provided differing opinions on the tax treatment of Bitcoins, including some that could lead taxpayers to believe that transacting in virtual currencies relieves them of their responsibilities to report and pay taxes,” reads the GAO’s Virtual Economies and Currencies report.

For this reason, authorities must seek to instil a system that makes clear cryptocurrencies’ taxable liabilities. “A global definition and understanding of what constitutes a virtual currency is almost certainly required,” says Asquith. “The problem is who would put this together. The European Commission or OECD would be a good start. However, as with other related questions (e.g. how do we tax companies with global operations?), countries still have sovereign authority, so would not necessarily by bound by any international standard.”

Tax indecision
In December, Norway’s government deemed Bitcoin unworthy of the conventional currency tag and opted instead to treat it as an asset, given that it’s not tied to any centralised government agency. Elsewhere, Singapore’s Inland Revenue Authority recently decided to tax Bitcoin under the goods and services bracket, whereas both Slovenian and German governments have pledged to crack down on related tax issues, though the system by which this is enforced is yet to be decided upon.

This same sense of ambiguity has worked in the favour of Bitcoin these past 12 months

This same sense of ambiguity has worked in the favour of Bitcoin these past 12 months, as individuals across the globe have clamoured to get on board with what remains the world’s most unregulated and valuable currency. For those unfamiliar with the events of this past year (see Fig. 1), a single Bitcoin was worth as little as $13.50 at the onset of 2013, and by November had reached a peak of $1,200. Put mildly, Bitcoin is gaining momentum, and some suspect it could easily be worth as much as $100,000 as it moves into the mainstream in the coming months and years.

The key question going forward should be whether cryptocurrencies are labelled as a currency, or an alternative financial instrument of some sort. This question, though seemingly trivial, will come to determine how entities such as Bitcoin are taxed and, more importantly, at what rate. The decision ultimately boils down to whether cryptocurrencies should be subject to income tax or capital gains tax, and with the former being much higher than the latter, it’s quite clear which option proponents of the currency will be rooting for.

Mounting concerns
It is only after clear guidelines have been set out by authorities that questions can then be asked of the extent to which users are manipulating the system. “I think it is fast becoming a concern with the 2013 appreciation in the value of Bitcoin,” says Asquith. “This has put it on the radars of tax authorities around the world. They see it as a potential source of new revenues and are anxious to exploit this in the wake of the financial crisis and ballooning government deficits. The tax authorities also want to help the new currencies flourish, especially if they do emerge as an acceptable alternative payment platform. This means giving clear tax guidance to the market players so that they can plan their businesses and grow.”

By design, cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin were not intended to be anonymous but rather decentralised, and the perpetuation of anything else is merely a misunderstanding on the part of ill-informed sources. While the currency’s paper-thin regulatory bounds appear to have worked in its favour in recent months, for the phenomenon to be more readily accepted by authorities across the globe and for its to continue to grow, users must be prepared to embrace the appropriate tax implications.

There is no doubt that cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin could come to be seen as a currency in their own right by authorities, but before that happens, they must put to paper exactly how they are liable to tax, so as to avoid it being seen merely as the tax havens of the digital era.

A clash that’s losing cash: Thai economy slows down

Thailand has cut a key interest rate for the first time this year in order to bolster its economy after political unrest and on-going outflows from emerging markets have curbed local demand and hurt tourism.

The Bank of Thailand cut its one-day bond repurchase rate by a quarter of a percentage point to two percent, after monetary policy committee members agreed to lower the rate as of March 12.

“Prolonged political uncertainties will continue to impede the recovery of private consumption and investment. Our monetary policy has some scope to ease, in order to lend more support to the economy and ensure continuous financial accommodation,” said assistant governor Paiboon Kittisrikangwan in a statement.

The move comes at a time when emerging markets, particularly those in Asia, are experiencing outflows and falling production as their economic growth continues to slow down. A recent purchasing managers index by HSBC revealed that China’s factory activity shrank again in February as output and new orders fell to an all-new low, reinforcing concerns of a slowdown in the world’s second largest economy.

[P]olitical instability has taken a toll on economic growth and the central bank must act

In comparison, Thai consumer confidence fell to its lowest in more than 12 years in February as anti-government protests proceeded for the fourth month running. Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service last week warned about risks to the nation’s creditworthiness if the political gridlock continues.

“Although monetary policy can’t solve the government’s issues, political instability has taken a toll on economic growth and the central bank must act,” said Matthew Circosta, an economist at Moody’s Analytics.

“What Thailand needs now is lower rates to boost other sectors in the economy, including consumption and business investment.”

Following the recent committee move, as well as another decrease back in November 2013, the Thai interest rate is currently at its lowest since December 2012. In addition, the monetary authority said in a statement that it sees Thailand’s economic growth this year at less than three percent.

Thailand’s GDP rose 0.6 percent in the last quarter of 2013 – the weakest expansion since the first quarter of 2012 – lowering the state planning agency’s GDP growth forecast for this year to three – four percent from a range of four – five percent.

Is Arctic drilling worth the risk?

Tucked away among the Arctic’s ever-shifting jags of ice, hidden from the naked eye, are billions upon billions of dollars in black gold. The Arctic landscape, spanning the Barents to the Beaufort Sea and beyond, is home to a reported 30 percent of the world’s undiscovered natural gas reserves and 13 percent of its oil. Whoever conquers it will lay claim to 1,669 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 90 billion barrels of oil – almost three times the annual global consumption.

Arctic treasures

1,669tn

Cubic feet of natural gas

90bn

Barrels of oil

Much of the prospective total, according to the US Geological Survey, sits offshore and is up for the taking, provided that those with suitably high ambitions come equipped with the necessary tools, know-how and – most importantly – resources to do so. Although the region accounts for as little as six percent of the Earth’s surface, it accounts for a disproportionately large amount of its resources, and it is this supposed abundance of hydrocarbons that has seen energy companies clamour for the rights to the region’s many opportunities.

“It is only in the last five years that hydrocarbon development has actually been contemplated as a possibility, principally due to technological and navigational advances,” says Trevor Slack, Senior Analyst at risk analysis company Maplecroft. “To varying degrees, Russia, Canada, the US, Norway and Greenland have all increased exploration and development activity on their relevant portions of the Arctic continental shelf.”

The majority of the Arctic countries have granted energy companies licenses to explore offshore reserves, however, the exploration phase is only a fraction of the overall effort required to reap the region’s riches. The difficulties companies face while working in the region can perhaps best be seen in the case of Royal Dutch Shell and the crisis that befell the Kulluk drilling rig late last year.

“What is failure but a bump on the road to triumph?” asked the company on its website soon after the 266ft barge ran aground off the Alaskan coast: circumstances that later incurred an impairment charge of $200m.

The failed expedition constitutes only a slither of the oil giant’s overall Arctic spending, which has so far amassed upwards of $5bn and yielded very little in the way of returns. Despite having introduced an armada of 20 support vessels, chartered well over a thousand dedicated flights, and exhausted $1bn on the project through the last year alone, the Anglo-Dutch powerhouse is yet to complete a single well in the region.

While these circumstances could well be considered a failure of sorts, they could just as easily be seen as par for the course, as the extraction of Arctic oil and gas ranks among the most expensive business opportunities in the world.

“Oil spill risks, high extraction costs, doubts over the amount of commercially recoverable reserves, and a precedent of cost overruns and delays combine to raise questions about the commercial viability of some proposed Arctic projects,” reads a Greenpeace report into Arctic exploration risks. “The drilling conditions facing oil companies operating in the Arctic are some of the most challenging on Earth.”

Risk and reward
The challenges of tapping the Arctic’s resources are quite plain to see, these being a harsh climate, underdeveloped infrastructure, long project cycles, spill containment and recovery risks, and conflicting sovereignty claims, to name but a few. All things considered, the complications have caused some to question whether the investment is actually worth the costs, whether they be financial or environmental.

Total is the first major oil company to publicly denounce offshore exploration in the Arctic, with the company’s CEO Christophe de Margerie expressing fears about the potential damages of a spill: “Oil on Greenland would be a disaster,” he told the Financial Times. “A leak would do too much damage to the image of the company.”

Total’s stance on the matter is very much the exception, however, with various competitors such as ExxonMobil, Rosneft, Eni, Statoil and, of course, Shell, having committed a great deal of time and money to the Arctic endeavour.

Arctic drilling is no walk in the sunshine. Total CEO Christophe de Margerie is one of few oil leaders to give it a wide berth, deeming the risk of oil spills too high
Arctic drilling is no walk in the sunshine. Total CEO Christophe de Margerie is one of few oil leaders to give it a wide berth, deeming the risk of oil spills too high

Despite previous problems, Shell hopes to resume its work in the Arctic at some point this year, with CFO Simon Henry believing the region to be the “most attractive single opportunity for the future,” as stated in The Telegraph.

However, the company will be subject to far closer scrutiny than before in light of its previous failings. Shell’s return to the Arctic – however delayed – will be watched by environmentalists, whose concerns for the surrounding environment need not be explained, as well as industry rivals, who will be keen to know whether or not the
region’s treasures can be extracted.

Exploration obstacles
Although Shell appears quite intent on exploiting the Arctic’s natural resources, a US appeals court has recently ruled that the Alaskan government acted illegally in granting Shell exploration rights to Arctic waters controlled by the US, which has, in effect, curbed the company’s oil ambitions further still.

The extraction site was sold for $2.66bn in 2008, of which $2.1bn was paid for by Shell, and has since been hotly contested by local and environmental groups, who claim the consequences were ill conceived and its environmental impact sorely underplayed.

Another major player whose progress has been hindered by development costs and other such obstacles is Norway’s Statoil, which late last year expressed concerns about the challenges of exploring and extracting Arctic hydrocarbon reserves.

“Logistical difficulties, regulatory hurdles, jurisdictional tensions, environmental opposition and above all extremely inhospitable climatic conditions will ensure that oil and gas activity in the region remains problematic, complex and expensive,” says Slack.

Many believe the inadequate infrastructure and tumultuous weather conditions, combined with the falling price of oil and gas, to be the perfect storm when it comes to
Arctic exploration

“Cost is probably the most important factor, with Statoil estimating that the cost of drilling one oil well in the Arctic could be as much as $500m. This is likely to be prohibitive for most companies in the current climate, with some analysts predicting that the price of crude could drop in the medium term.”

Statoil’s Exploration Chief Tim Dodson spoke at a climate change conference last year about some of the issues facing oil companies in the Arctic. “We don’t envisage production from several of these areas before 2030 at the earliest; more likely 2040, probably not until 2050,” he said. “I think what we have to realise is that the challenges our industry faces in the Arctic are at least as significant as we thought they were just a couple of years back, but they’re not insurmountable.”

Edinburgh-based Cairn Energy, meanwhile, has announced that, regardless of having spent over $1bn in the region, it is deprioritising its Greenland operations after not having made a single commercial find as of yet.

Many believe the inadequate infrastructure and tumultuous weather conditions, combined with the falling price of oil and gas, to be the perfect storm when it comes to Arctic exploration. These circumstances mean that short-term financial benefits can only be marginal at best, until stratospheric sums of capital are poured into developing the region.

Charlie Kronick, Senior Climate Advisor at Greenpeace UK, is sceptical. “[It] is impossible to drill safely for oil in the ice covered waters of the Arctic – the potential impacts on local livelihoods and biodiversity are uncostable. It would be literally impossible – for both technical and environmental reasons – to clean up after the inevitable spill, while the level of climate change that would result from successful (in economic terms) drilling there would be catastrophic.”

A report conducted by Lloyd’s and Chatham House found that investment in the Arctic could reach $100bn by 2022, as companies scramble to gain a foothold. “Business activity in the Arctic region is undeniably increasing, and the impact of climate change means that this is likely to grow significantly in the future. But as new opportunities open up, decisions on exploiting them need to be made on the basis of as full an understanding of the risks as possible,” said Richard Ward, Chief Executive at Lloyd’s.

At present, any areas of the Arctic that are unrepresented are being hotly contested by the bordering countries. Regardless, it is crucial that businesses granted permission to work in the region align their goals with those of local governments, communities and the environment, as the territory proceeds to transform. In addition, those partaking in Arctic exploration should put in place strict measures to avoid any environmental disasters, and have procedures in place should the worst case scenario occur.

“The businesses which will succeed will be those which take their responsibilities to the region’s communities and environment seriously, working with other stakeholders to manage the wide range of Arctic risks and ensuring that future development is sustainable,” says Ward.

The Battle for Ownership

The Arctic Circle’s surrounding seas are, according to the 2008 United States Geological Survey, home to about 20 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and natural gas resources. Ownership of the region has been an ongoing issue for the best part of a century, with Canada first extending its maritime boundaries in 1925, shortly followed by Russia in 1926.

Since then an array of peculiar tactics have been used to assert ownership of the offshore continental shelves which could be stowing away masses of lucrative fuel – from Canada sending Inuit families to the High Arctic in what has been described as the use of ‘human flagpoles’, to Russia sending a submarine to the ocean bed of the North Pole to plant its national flag.

The Arctic Circle borders with eight countries: Canada, Iceland, Denmark/Greenland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russia, and the US, and current EEZ boundaries (exclusive economic zones that determine the limits of a country’s exploration rights) already account for possession of the majority of the region, with the disputed area being primarily the North Pole and the continental shelves which surround it.

Only five of the eight countries dispute this area. The responsibility for which continental shelf belongs to which country – if any at all – lies with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), an agreement set up by United Nations to determine activity within international waters.

Under rules instigated by UNCLOS, countries can only apply for an extended continental shelf after 10 years of signing up to the Convention. Norway made its extension application in 2006, Russia in 2007, Canada in 2013, Denmark will submit this year, and the US is unable to do so as it has not signed up to UNCLOS. Each country is fighting for ownership by ‘proving’ to the Convention – usually via land mapping – that it is the closest natural neighbour to the disputed areas.

Canada

Despite submitting only a preliminary claim in 2013, Canada says it has more to add, including outlining the North Pole as part of its legal territory, with Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird saying Canada needs more time to complete its scientific research.

Canada-arctic-border

Canada has the northernmost settlement, Alert, Nunavut, home to a Canadian Forces station and has spent $200m on icebreakers, helicopters, scientists and submarines to acquire the relevant data. It is currently in a long-running dispute with the US over the boundaries of the Beaufort Sea but has so far drilled 90 wells there, and has further experience in the Mackenzie Delta region.

Russia

Russia already owns more than half of the Arctic’s total resources, and in 2007 it filed a claim that includes the continental shelf under the North Pole, as well as the Lomonosov Ridge, as an extension of the Siberian continental shelf. In the same year it also sent mini-submarines to plant its national flag on the seabed, 14,000ft below sea level.

Russia-oil-exploration

In retaliation to Canada’s assertion it would stake claim to the North Pole, in late 2013 President Putin ordered his leadership to increase its military presence in the Arctic as a point of priority, and has built the world’s most expensive ice-breaker, the ’50 years of Victory’ (pictured) for further exploration.

Denmark/Greenland

Denmark will file a claim in 2014, declaring it the legal owner of the Great Belt, the Little Belt, and the Danish part of the Sound. As Greenland falls under Danish sovereignty, it will claim the Lomonosov Ridge falls within Danish territory and has the closest coastline to the North Pole. It has spent the last 10 years garnering scientific data in an effort to expand its continental shelf status.

Denmark-Arctic-border

Despite being a part of Denmark, Greenland has been self-governing for 300 years and could use the development of its oil industry to gain full independence from Denmark. It has formed relationships with Cairn Energy, Shell and Statoil as part of this process.

Norway

In 2006, Norway filed a claim to extend its EEZ in three areas, the Barents Sea, the Western Nansen Basin and the ‘Banana Hole’ in the Norwegian Sea, and states that it will make an additional submission once it has finished mapping its continental shelf.

Norway-Arctic-border

In 2010 Norway won a long-running dispute with Russia over ownership of the Barents Sea, with Norway recently acquiring its twelfth production licence, with more acreage becoming available in 2013-2014. Norway has arguably the best infrastructure in place for Arctic drilling, with Statoil operating the world’s most northerly LNG production plant near Hammerfest.

US

The US has not ratified UNCLOS and therefore isn’t eligible to file a claim. Regardless, the US Coast Guard has sent a team to map the sea floor of Alaska in order to determine its continental shelf. The fact it has not ratified the UN agreement is perhaps the biggest cloud hanging over the dispute, as the US may not recognise any conclusions made by UNCLOS, which could lead to widespread conflict.

Us-Arctic-Border

With oil exploration already taking place in North Alaska, notably in Prudhoe Bay (pictured), it already has the infrastructure to drill in such conditions. It is estimated that 65 percent of undiscovered oil lies on the North American side of the Arctic.