Are your people a cost centre or a profit centre?

Workforce analytics can help managers understand the value of their staff instead of only their cost – and thus align HR operation with profitability

We see it every day in the media, particularly over the past few years: “Top company cuts thousands of staff.” All too often, senior executives and managers leap to the belief that headcount equates to only cost, neglecting the value side of the equation. They look over the numbers for staff pay packets, staff benefits and various staff facilities, and panic about how much their costs are adding up. What senior executives don’t often realise is that headcount is also about driving increases in revenue and profit. As a result, most organisations are underperforming, in some cases dramatically, and don’t know why.

The good news is there is a little-known solution lurking just around the corner, ready to be brought to bear to help increase shareholder value. This solution is workforce analytics – an important tool to help companies develop a clear understanding of the value of their people and the levers that can be pulled to increase revenue and profit. These levers are simple: accurate data about getting the right number of people in the right place at the right time. Workforce analytics has been proven to help senior executives understand the contribution of headcount to profitability, and how an increase (and effective deployment) of the right kind of staff can be beneficial to the company and for shareholder return.

Indeed, while researching workforce analytics during the process of writing the upcoming book, Calculating Success, we came across evidence that leaders in many companies are managing workforces without knowing how many employees they have or how they are deployed, let alone how many more or what type of staff are needed in order to grow and expand the business. As a result, following headcount reductions caused by the financial crisis, many workforces are simply overheating under an increased workload, with too few people trying to complete too much work (and sometimes two people working on the same task without even realising it).
These are all problems that effective workforce analytics could solve.

A six-step model
Understanding workforce analytics is a discipline. It involves implementing clear set processes, creating a robust system for predictive data analytics, training up staff and getting people’s heads around it.

In Calculating Success, we developed a six-step model to simple, but effective, workforce analytics.

First, it is necessary to frame the central problem. This involves taking time to really understand the organisational issues at hand. This may involve interviewing key managers across HR, finance and other functions, as well as reviewing documents that provide context, such as organisational structure, central business initiatives and project plans.

Once the organisation issues and the problems to be solved are defined, step two involves applying a conceptual model to guide the analysis. This means it is necessary to identify workforce and business variables which are likely to have associations with the problem outcome. This may involve being alert to idiosyncratic events and additional data that could be relevant.

The third step involves capturing the relevant data across all the relevant business units, be it HR, operations, finance or marketing. Any differences in definitions, codes and time frames can then be reconciled while valid data is stored in analytical databases.

Formal quantitative techniques can then be applied to this data, looking for stable patterns over time. This fourth step is where insights to solving the business issues are developed – valid data that tells us what the real story is all about. Using this data, statistical findings should be worked through with key stakeholders to gain buy-in and take decisions at the fifth step. It is essential that these results are presented in a way that is understandable to managers who do not have a statistical background. In this stage, any new problems that surface can be considered, along with any issues which require further analysis and understanding.

Finally, action must be taken to implement solutions. This may involve operational changes in policies, procedures and management actions regarding workforce recruitment, development and deployment: designed to produce the desired changes in workforce performance. Any changes in actions should then be monitored and updated; and the six-step cycle begins again.

Counting value over cost
If more companies gain a better understanding of the value – instead of just the cost – of their workforce, they will increase productivity, and thus improve revenue and profit. In our experience (and recent studies show), organisations that see people as profit centres tend to grow in size and value, and ultimately hire more people. In many countries unemployment and underemployment is at an all-time high – but if organisations came to understand the actual value of people, this wouldn’t be the case.

The big question is, “Is your HR organisation up to the task?” And sadly, the answer tends not to be a positive one.

HR guru Professor Dave Ulrich, best known for his eponymous HR Roles Model, recently spoke at Maxxim Consulting’s recent event, “Whats next for HR?” which looked at the importance of workforce analytics in the changing HR landscape.

According to Ulrich, when HR workers are asked about the biggest challenge in their jobs, he found the answers tended to range from “building credibility with my line managers,” to “bringing in new talent,” or even “handling employee grievances.” Although all of these concerns are essential to HR (there is no opportunity for development if you cannot do the basics well) these are all problems which are associated with the administrative functions of HR, or the design of innovative practices surrounding rewards and communication. The future for HR, however, is to be able to apply HR practices to respond to external business conditions.

In other words, it is no longer enough to just think about creating value by serving employees, but by making sure that services offered inside the company align to the expectations outside of it. Every HR practice can be transformed by seeing the value that it creates for those outside of the company. This positions HR not just to respond to strategy but to helping shape and create it.

Outcomes, not actions
In order to achieve this, Ulrich says, a seismic shift needs to take place to transform the way HR is considered today. HR professionals need to begin to think more in terms of consequences, instead of actions, and focus on the phrase ‘so that.’ By appending ‘so that’ to their aims, achievements and challenges, HR professionals are pushed to see the outcome of their work – not just the work itself.

Even better, says Ulrich, is when two ‘so that’ stages can be incorporated, to connect HR with the broader context of a business. It is no longer enough to merely think “My challenge is to build credibility with my line managers.” Instead develop the statement into, for example, “My challenge is to build credibility with my line managers; so that we can make better investments that help the business reach its goals; so that we can anticipate and respond to external business conditions and deliver value to customers.” In this way, HR professionals are no longer merely responding to the administrative functions of HR, but are looking at the greater business context and expectations outside of the company.

This shift in the thinking of HR professionals, however, is highly dependent upon those professionals understanding their business context and the value of people. Unfortunately, in Ulrich’s research on HR competencies, he found that HR professionals were consistently lacking in business acumen. Indeed, many HR professionals went into HR to avoid the quantitative side of business in the first place! However, in order to move with the future of HR, it is no longer possible to side-step data, evidence and analytics – disciplines which bring rigour to HR.

As HR has become increasingly aligned with business, workforce analytics have become increasingly important. While many HR decisions require insight and judgment, improved workforce metrics helps HR move towards professional rigour. This is where workforce analytics, the topic of Calculating Success, is so essential to help HR stay ahead of the times, and become an essential component to the development of any business.

For more information – www.maxximconsulting.com

Comments: 2
Join the discussion below

The May – June 2013 Issue

Highest corporate tax
rates in Europe

European countries are scrambling to raise every last penny of funds through taxes. But some countries may have gone too far...

Belgium

Though all business taxes in Belgium can be paid online with little effort and preparation, the rates are still sky-high at 57.7 percent, including a staggering 50.8 percent total rate on profits only in social security contributions.

Belarus

In Belarus, a company spends up to 338 hours annually preparing for and paying ten different taxes and duties. The total tax rate has incredibly been lowered to 60.7 percent, from 117.5 percent in 2008.

France

A company in France pays seven different taxes and duties, the sum of which can amount to 65.7 percent of profits; though President François Hollande has announced a wave of business tax rate cuts coming up.

Estonia

A business in Estonia pays 67.3 percent of profits in tax, 37.2 percent exclusively in social security contributions. The country has gone against the grain in Europe by raising businesses taxes from 48.6 percent in 2008 to the current rates.

Italy

While corporate income tax (IRES) in Italy is limited to 38 percent of taxable profit, a company operating in Italy can expect to pay 14 other taxes and duties, including social security contributions, bringing their total payable tax to 68.7 percent of profits, according to the World Bank.

Norway

Norway taxes motor fuels twice, with a road use tax and a CO2 emissions tax. Combined with strikes in the energy sector that have curbed output, the price of gas at a local pump has soared to $10.12 per gallon.

Turkey

Though Turkey sits on the Suez Canal and neighbours many oil rich countries, the price of a gallon of average gas clocks in at $9.41 in Turkish pumps, because of a 60 percent share of taxes. 

Israel

Like Turkey, Israel is surrounded by oil-rich neighbours, but drills very little itself. Gas prices are controlled by the government, so about half of the $9.28 per gallon goes to taxes.

Hong Kong

There are few gas stations in Hong Kong, but the ones available charge up to 76 percent more per gallon than mainland China, where the government caps the cost of fuel. A gallon at the pumps will cost around $8.61 on the island.

Netherlands

Expensive labour costs make the Dutch petrol prices the dearest in Europe, at $8.26 per gallon; though the 57 percent tax add-ons don’t help.

The credit crisis

8 February 2007
HSBC warns of subprime mortgage losses

2 April 2007
New Century goes bus

14 September 2007
Wholesale markets have dried up

17 March 2008
Rescue of Bear Stearns

7 September 2008
Rescue of Fannie Mae

15 September 2008
Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy

3 October 2008
US congress approves $700bn bailout

14 February 2009
$787bn stimulus approved by congress

 

The effects of the current financial crisis are global and irrefutable. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the domino effect of irresponsible public monetary policies, huge levels of unsustainable debt, and a deregulated financial sector, has escalated to the point where no corner of the globe has been left untouched.

1973 oil crisis

October 1973
Syria and Egypt launch an attack on Israel on Yom Kippur and set off a twenty day war;

1977
US President Carter creates Department of Energy, which develops the US strategic petroleum reserve

 

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) used their oil reserves as a weapon with the Arab Oil Embargo against those who supported Israel. By January 1974, world oil prices were four times higher than they were at the start of the crisis, especially in the US, and the shock led to a huge drop in the stock market with NYSE losing $97bn in just six weeks.  The embargo lasted five months, and the effects are still seen today.

German hyperinflation

1922-1923

Hyperinflation
1923 – 1924
Stabilisation

 

The trouble began when Germany missed a repatriation payment, worth about one third of the German deficit in this period. Inflation was already high but by 1923 it was raging. Prices doubled within hours, and by late 1923, it cost 200bn marks to buy a single loaf of bread. People burned money as it was cheaper than buying firewood. Germany eventually regained control of its economy when it introduced the Rentenmark into circulation in 1923, and then the Reichmark in 1924.

The Great Depression

1929-1933
The Great Crash
1934-1939
Recovery and Recession

 

After the decadence of the Roaring Twenties, the 1930s saw the biggest economic slump of all time. The stock market crashed on 29 October 1929, and optimism and decadent living tumbled along with the figures. The GDP fell from $103.6bn in 1929, to $66bn in 1934 and the subsequent years of recovery were the most dramatic in US history.

1907 bankers’ panic

1907
Otto Heinze and his brother Augustus Heinze bought shares of United Copper.

 

The stock market was already cautious over the tight money supply, but the US was thrown into a depression after the stock market fell nearly 50 percent from its peak in 1906. The Heinze brothers thought they could influence market shares but ended up bankrupting lenders that provided the financing to buy the stock. A chain reaction left nine institutions bankrupt. By February 1908, the panic was over and the government created the Federal Reserve system, to prevent banks from exercising too much control over the economy.