The issues of tax transparency and an increasingly complex world are making trusts and foundations more important for families to consider as part of their asset protection and succession planning. Many traditional providers of trust and foundation services are troubled by increased complexity and a growing need for tax compliance.
A number of bank-owned trust companies have been sold or scaled down, law firms and others operating smaller fiduciary services companies have been selling their businesses, and for many trust and foundation providers, there is serious concern about the future.
Trusts have had a long history, as has their civil law sibling, the foundation. While the two have many differences, they also have many similarities, and are broadly interchangeable vehicles that can be used by families to achieve a number of important objectives. Both are very flexible, but it is this flexibility that has contributed to misuses of trusts and foundations, particularly with regard to tax evasion and badly executed attempts at what was wrongly perceived as legal tax avoidance.
The recent move to tax transparency is not an attack on trusts and foundations, but rather an attack on any attempt to conceal income and assets that are legally required to be disclosed under tax laws applicable to those with relevant interests in the income and assets involved. There is no question that trusts and foundations are part of the new focus on how wealth owners structure their affairs, but for the well-advised wealth owner, it is more the case that trusts and foundations have to be considered as key tools in the wealth planning toolbox.
A rapidly changing world requires new ways of managing and navigating family wealth. For this challenge, we bring the right people to the table
To gain a better insight into trusts and foundations and the current role and challenges they face in the world, World Finance spoke to Philip Marcovici, Member of the Board at Kaiser Partner.
What can trusts and foundations achieve that other structures cannot easily replicate?
Both trusts and foundations offer families the ability to set out how they would like assets to be held and distributed in the long term. Structures can help to oversee family assets, with appropriate ‘checks and balances’ over trustees or foundation board members who take on the responsibility to look after things in a way that meets the needs of the family involved.
If a wealth owner has young children, and the wealth owner dies or becomes disabled, how can the wealth owner ensure his children will be properly looked after financially and the assets properly administered? If the children reach the age of 18, is it appropriate that they come into meaningful amounts of wealth? Is it important for someone to consider the intentions of the deceased or disabled wealth owner regarding how the assets should be administered and distributed?
Insurance structures, partnerships, corporate vehicles and other structures are all important elements of good wealth and succession planning. But it is not straightforward for these structures to provide the potential for long-term succession and asset protection planning that trusts and foundations can provide.
How do trusts and foundations work?
In very simple terms, there are four characteristics of trusts and foundations that are important to understand: these characteristics are revocable, irrevocable, fixed and discretionary. The settlor of a trust or the founder of a foundation is able to choose, when establishing the structure, whether to retain a right to ‘revoke’ or cancel the structure.
Being irrevocable does not mean the founder or settlor cannot be a potential beneficiary, but it does mean a clear right to cancel the structure and get the assets back does not exist. While it may be tempting to think it is always better to have a structure be revocable, this is not necessarily the case. If I am a founder or settlor, and am concerned about future lawsuits I may face, will the assets held in a trust or foundation be safer against claimants if I have a legal right to get the assets back, as opposed to an irrevocable structure, where I do not?
And is it better in the context of the wealth owner’s objectives for the trust or foundation to be fixed or discretionary? There is no single right answer, but the key is to understand the difference. If the structure is required to distribute to my child when he reaches the age of 25, my child is a beneficiary with a ‘fixed’ interest. If the trustee or foundation does not make the distribution, my son can sue to enforce his rights.
The opposite is where the structure is ‘discretionary’, meaning the trustee or foundation board does not have to distribute to my son when he reaches 25. I, as the settlor or founder, may have provided a ‘letter of wishes’ expressing my hope the trustee or foundation board would consider a distribution when my son reaches 25, but by leaving this in the discretion of the trustee or foundation board, my son does not have a legal right to force a distribution.
Is this good or bad? This depends: if my son is subject to a marital or other dispute, the assets may be significantly safer if my son does not have a legal right to the assets.
Good governance in trusts and foundations requires careful attention in overseeing the trustee or foundation board, and this is often achieved through the inclusion of a protector or guardian. A good trustee or foundation provider will provide wealth-owning families with clarity on the choices they have and help guide them through the many ‘what-ifs’ families should be asking themselves on an ongoing basis.
But what about tax and reporting?
The good news for wealth owners is that, in many countries, trusts and foundations are becoming increasingly understood, with the development of tax and reporting rules that clarify the tax treatment of trusts, and when and how interests in trusts need to be reported.
This is a good thing, as tax planning – which can still be achieved in legal and accepted ways using trusts and foundations – is only one of many needs of wealth-owning families: political risk; the destruction of wealth divorce claims give rise to; asset protection from creditor and other claims; succession and protection of the younger generation; ensuring assets are properly identified and administered; dealing with complex family relationships; holding special assets such as collectibles and businesses and much, much more can be addressed using well thought-out trusts and foundations.
Can you provide an example of why a trust or foundation may be a smart solution for a wealth owner?
A wealth owner considers giving a substantial gift to their daughter, who is in her 20s. Should this be a direct gift or a transfer to a trust or foundation for the daughter’s benefit?
If the daughter receives a gift of $10m, on the death of the wealth owner or before, what happens if her new husband comes up with a hare-brained business idea and tries to convince his wife to fund his business? What if there is a divorce? What if the daughter, on becoming a plastic surgeon, makes a mistake in the first surgery she performs? All or part of the money will be gone. What if the daughter moves to Canada or China or the US or to one of many other countries? She will be taxed on a worldwide basis on the income generated by investing the $10m, and if she dies and passes assets to her children, there may be tax at that time: in Canada, on the basis of a deemed disposition of assets, or in the US, under the estate tax rules of that country. And in the case of a country like China, ownership of the assets would also subject the daughter to exchange control and other rules.
If the daughter, instead, is a discretionary beneficiary of a trust or foundation established by her parent, the position may be transformed. If her husband has a good business idea, he cannot pressure his wife into supporting it. He needs to convince a professional trustee or foundation board that will be more able to say no – if saying no is the right decision.
Lawsuits against the daughter, for professional negligence, divorce or otherwise, will be difficult to enforce against assets in the trust or foundation if it was well structured and maintained. And in the tax area, Canada, the US and many other potential countries of residence are good examples of fully disclosed use of trusts and foundations that can permit significant tax savings. In both Canada and the US, appropriately structured trusts and foundations can permit beneficiaries to avoid taxation on both the earnings on assets held in the discretionary structure and on fully disclosed distributions. And assets that stay in trust or in the foundation can be held for further generations without exposure to taxes that arise on death and through gifts.